On 06.03.2013 13:43, Peter Klügl wrote:
On 05.03.2013 16:15, Marshall Schor wrote:
On 3/5/2013 5:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
The vote passes with the following result:
+1 Marshall Schor
+1 Tommaso Teofili
+1 Peter Klügl
No other votes were received.
Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help
and for
investing so much time :-)
I will proceed with the checklist:
http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing
Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download and
documentation?
Yes, it should have this :-)
I suggest the documentation go on the website under
docs/d/textmarker-current/
(we normally have the website accessible docs for the current
release, but
sometimes may need others). The pointers to this could be in several
places.
It should have at least the same presence as other "sandbox" items,
but given
its new-ness and the amount of "stuff" that it entails, it seems to
me it could
have somewhat more prominence.
I added a short text to the sandbox components, which points to the
new page and to other locations, but the documentation is not
available. Did I miss something? Do I need to do something in order to
publish the /d/ stuff?
About the link: If it is OK, then I am so bold and will include a link
between "Addons and Sandbox" and "External Resources" in the left
navigation menu.
The download: The download page, because of repetitive complexity, is a
combination of normal web markup plus generated things. The
generated things
come from specs in the file xdocs/stylesheets/project.xml
It looks like a bit of redesign is warranted to support TextMarker
and the
pending release of individual add-ons.
I suggest another "box" for these, which looks like the existing one
but has 1
more column - the release date (in the other "boxes", the release
date was put
in the title above the box, but that kind of breaks down when the
rows in the
box all might have different release dates).
Let me know if you need help with doing this.
I will take a look at it now :-)
Hmm.. I am not sure about the best way to design or implement it.
Nevertheless, I prepared something. It's not very nice and I am abusing
the version parameter. The xml elements have additional attributes and
the script adds the html elements dependent on their existence. For
textmarker, there is now not a table for a release version, but for all
versions of the component.
Here's the download page:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/site/downloads.html
... and the main site with the textmarker link:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/site/
If the solution is OK for now, then I would extend the news and send an
announce mail.
Peter
Peter
-Marshall
Peter
