Re: the download: the only thing to download in this release is the source-release.zip, I think (since we're not releasing the binary zip/tar assemblies at this time). The other artifacts are released to Maven Central.
-Marshall On 3/5/2013 10:15 AM, Marshall Schor wrote: > On 3/5/2013 5:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote: >> Hi, >> >> The vote passes with the following result: >> >> +1 Marshall Schor >> +1 Tommaso Teofili >> +1 Peter Klügl >> >> No other votes were received. >> >> Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help and for >> investing so much time :-) >> >> I will proceed with the checklist: >> http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing >> >> Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download and >> documentation? > Yes, it should have this :-) > > I suggest the documentation go on the website under > docs/d/textmarker-current/ > (we normally have the website accessible docs for the current release, but > sometimes may need others). The pointers to this could be in several places. > It should have at least the same presence as other "sandbox" items, but given > its new-ness and the amount of "stuff" that it entails, it seems to me it > could > have somewhat more prominence. > > The download: The download page, because of repetitive complexity, is a > combination of normal web markup plus generated things. The generated things > come from specs in the file xdocs/stylesheets/project.xml > > It looks like a bit of redesign is warranted to support TextMarker and the > pending release of individual add-ons. > > I suggest another "box" for these, which looks like the existing one but has 1 > more column - the release date (in the other "boxes", the release date was put > in the title above the box, but that kind of breaks down when the rows in the > box all might have different release dates). > > Let me know if you need help with doing this. > > -Marshall >> >> Peter >> >
