If there are no objections, I will commit the changes for the website
since they are not really invasive and fulfill their purpose.
Has anyone an idea why
http://uima.apache.org/d/textmarker-current/tools.textmarker.book.html
is not accessible?
Peter
On 06.03.2013 15:03, Peter Klügl wrote:
On 06.03.2013 13:43, Peter Klügl wrote:
On 05.03.2013 16:15, Marshall Schor wrote:
On 3/5/2013 5:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
The vote passes with the following result:
+1 Marshall Schor
+1 Tommaso Teofili
+1 Peter Klügl
No other votes were received.
Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help
and for
investing so much time :-)
I will proceed with the checklist:
http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing
Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download
and
documentation?
Yes, it should have this :-)
I suggest the documentation go on the website under
docs/d/textmarker-current/
(we normally have the website accessible docs for the current
release, but
sometimes may need others). The pointers to this could be in
several places.
It should have at least the same presence as other "sandbox" items,
but given
its new-ness and the amount of "stuff" that it entails, it seems to
me it could
have somewhat more prominence.
I added a short text to the sandbox components, which points to the
new page and to other locations, but the documentation is not
available. Did I miss something? Do I need to do something in order
to publish the /d/ stuff?
About the link: If it is OK, then I am so bold and will include a
link between "Addons and Sandbox" and "External Resources" in the
left navigation menu.
The download: The download page, because of repetitive complexity, is a
combination of normal web markup plus generated things. The
generated things
come from specs in the file xdocs/stylesheets/project.xml
It looks like a bit of redesign is warranted to support TextMarker
and the
pending release of individual add-ons.
I suggest another "box" for these, which looks like the existing one
but has 1
more column - the release date (in the other "boxes", the release
date was put
in the title above the box, but that kind of breaks down when the
rows in the
box all might have different release dates).
Let me know if you need help with doing this.
I will take a look at it now :-)
Hmm.. I am not sure about the best way to design or implement it.
Nevertheless, I prepared something. It's not very nice and I am
abusing the version parameter. The xml elements have additional
attributes and the script adds the html elements dependent on their
existence. For textmarker, there is now not a table for a release
version, but for all versions of the component.
Here's the download page:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/site/downloads.html
... and the main site with the textmarker link:
http://people.apache.org/~pkluegl/site/
If the solution is OK for now, then I would extend the news and send
an announce mail.
Peter
Peter
-Marshall
Peter
