On 05.03.2013 16:15, Marshall Schor wrote:
On 3/5/2013 5:25 AM, Peter Klügl wrote:
Hi,
The vote passes with the following result:
+1 Marshall Schor
+1 Tommaso Teofili
+1 Peter Klügl
No other votes were received.
Thanks to you all, and special thanks to Marshall for all the help and for
investing so much time :-)
I will proceed with the checklist: http://uima.apache.org/release.html#Releasing
Are there any opinions on textmarker's web-presence, e.g., download and
documentation?
Yes, it should have this :-)
I suggest the documentation go on the website under docs/d/textmarker-current/
(we normally have the website accessible docs for the current release, but
sometimes may need others). The pointers to this could be in several places.
It should have at least the same presence as other "sandbox" items, but given
its new-ness and the amount of "stuff" that it entails, it seems to me it could
have somewhat more prominence.
I added a short text to the sandbox components, which points to the new
page and to other locations, but the documentation is not available. Did
I miss something? Do I need to do something in order to publish the /d/
stuff?
About the link: If it is OK, then I am so bold and will include a link
between "Addons and Sandbox" and "External Resources" in the left
navigation menu.
The download: The download page, because of repetitive complexity, is a
combination of normal web markup plus generated things. The generated things
come from specs in the file xdocs/stylesheets/project.xml
It looks like a bit of redesign is warranted to support TextMarker and the
pending release of individual add-ons.
I suggest another "box" for these, which looks like the existing one but has 1
more column - the release date (in the other "boxes", the release date was put
in the title above the box, but that kind of breaks down when the rows in the
box all might have different release dates).
Let me know if you need help with doing this.
I will take a look at it now :-)
Peter
-Marshall
Peter
