Are we sure that this is actually a CDDL/GPL licensed file? Is it possible it was mislabeled?
I can't find any reference to it in the grizzly code base. If you happen to have the pre-import source code around that would help. On Sun Jan 04 2015 at 4:52:45 PM Ed Anuff <[email protected]> wrote: > Are we OK with putting out a 1.0.x release that doesn't have Standalone or > Launcher? This seems problematic. > > Ed > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Rod Simpson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> The launcher is really just for convenience when initially playing around >> with Usergrid. I haven’t used it for a while and it may or may not even >> work fully. It certainly isn’t integral to the system. I would be fine >> with omitting it from this release. >> >> >> Rod >> >> >> >> -- >> Rod Simpson >> T @rockerston >> W rodsimpson.com >> >> On January 4, 2015 at 1:04:30 PM, John D. Ament ([email protected]) >> wrote: >> >> Yes, this is short term for the 1.0.1 release (can't ship it with the >> licensing state as is). >> >> According to the code, it looks like it's only used for css, but that >> could >> be a naming thing... >> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/blob/master/stack/launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/usergrid/launcher/Server.java#L159 >> >> Does anyone know who this is and if we have an SGA (or equiv) from >> him/her? >> >> >> https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/blob/master/stack/launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/usergrid/launcher/EmbeddedServerHelper.java#L20 >> >> I do have to ask, can we excluse the laucher from the release? >> >> John >> >> On Sun Jan 04 2015 at 2:53:06 PM Ed Anuff <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> > I thought this was for the 1.0.1 release though. Regardless of what we >> > want to do in 2.0, doesn't the current Launcher in 1.0 fire up an >> embedded >> > web server that serves, among other things, a few JSPs, CSS files, etc? >> I >> > understand the desire to blow aware the standalone server and launcher >> in >> > favor of other mechanisms (although I do think that will result in this >> > being harder, not easier, for people to run locally), which is fine for >> > ticket 308, but what about 1.0.x? >> > >> > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Nate McCall <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > >> > > > Agreed. The launcher is getting an overhaul in the 2.0 branch, we >> just >> > > > haven't decided what that is. >> > > >> > > Is there a Jira issue for this yet? I have some ideas (see below) >> > > >> > > > We've found the embedded Cassandra to be >> > > > problematic, so we're open to ideas of ways to create a more usable >> > > > standalone distro that utilizes the war binary created with our >> release >> > > > process. >> > > >> > > I don't think this is a realistic goal given the complexity. Running >> > > this as a "fat jar" application and forking Cassandra to it's own >> > > process would be the sanest approach. >> > > >> > > Them's my $0.02 - let's do discussion on a ticket though. Couldn't >> > > find one, so I created: >> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-308 >> > > >> > >> >
