It's based on this class - https://github.com/GrizzlyNIO/grizzly-mirror/blob/2.3.x/modules/http-server/src/main/java/org/glassfish/grizzly/http/server/StaticHttpHandler.java
StaticHttpHandler implements several methods as final or protected, making it not subclassable. This necessitated creating a new class. The skeleton of that class was copypasta from the original StaticHttpHandler. On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:01 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> wrote: > Are we sure that this is actually a CDDL/GPL licensed file? Is it possible > it was mislabeled? > > I can't find any reference to it in the grizzly code base. If you happen > to have the pre-import source code around that would help. > > On Sun Jan 04 2015 at 4:52:45 PM Ed Anuff <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Are we OK with putting out a 1.0.x release that doesn't have Standalone >> or Launcher? This seems problematic. >> >> Ed >> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Rod Simpson <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> The launcher is really just for convenience when initially playing >>> around with Usergrid. I haven’t used it for a while and it may or may not >>> even work fully. It certainly isn’t integral to the system. I would be >>> fine with omitting it from this release. >>> >>> >>> Rod >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Rod Simpson >>> T @rockerston >>> W rodsimpson.com >>> >>> On January 4, 2015 at 1:04:30 PM, John D. Ament ([email protected]) >>> wrote: >>> >>> Yes, this is short term for the 1.0.1 release (can't ship it with the >>> licensing state as is). >>> >>> According to the code, it looks like it's only used for css, but that >>> could >>> be a naming thing... >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/blob/master/stack/launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/usergrid/launcher/Server.java#L159 >>> >>> Does anyone know who this is and if we have an SGA (or equiv) from >>> him/her? >>> >>> >>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/blob/master/stack/launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/usergrid/launcher/EmbeddedServerHelper.java#L20 >>> >>> I do have to ask, can we excluse the laucher from the release? >>> >>> John >>> >>> On Sun Jan 04 2015 at 2:53:06 PM Ed Anuff <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> > I thought this was for the 1.0.1 release though. Regardless of what we >>> > want to do in 2.0, doesn't the current Launcher in 1.0 fire up an >>> embedded >>> > web server that serves, among other things, a few JSPs, CSS files, >>> etc? I >>> > understand the desire to blow aware the standalone server and launcher >>> in >>> > favor of other mechanisms (although I do think that will result in this >>> > being harder, not easier, for people to run locally), which is fine for >>> > ticket 308, but what about 1.0.x? >>> > >>> > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Nate McCall <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > > Agreed. The launcher is getting an overhaul in the 2.0 branch, we >>> just >>> > > > haven't decided what that is. >>> > > >>> > > Is there a Jira issue for this yet? I have some ideas (see below) >>> > > >>> > > > We've found the embedded Cassandra to be >>> > > > problematic, so we're open to ideas of ways to create a more usable >>> > > > standalone distro that utilizes the war binary created with our >>> release >>> > > > process. >>> > > >>> > > I don't think this is a realistic goal given the complexity. Running >>> > > this as a "fat jar" application and forking Cassandra to it's own >>> > > process would be the sanest approach. >>> > > >>> > > Them's my $0.02 - let's do discussion on a ticket though. Couldn't >>> > > find one, so I created: >>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-308 >>> > > >>> > >>> >>
