One more thing I thought of. Try to make sure the NOTICE file gets updated to include 2015.
On Sun Jan 04 2015 at 6:43:25 PM Rod Simpson <[email protected]> wrote: > Awesome. Sounds like a plan. > > -- > Rod Simpson > T @rockerston > W rodsimpson.com > > On January 4, 2015 at 4:01:56 PM, John D. Ament ([email protected]) > wrote: > > +1 I'm good with that. We do need to delete the file as well. > On Jan 4, 2015 5:48 PM, "Ed Anuff" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I think we can kill the CSS files if necessary, it looks like this is the > > only CSS file that I can find: > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/blob/ > master/stack/rest/src/main/webapp/css/styles.css > > > > Simply commenting it out should have no adverse effect except that > certain > > pages are not going to look so hot. > > > > I'm pretty sure we could easily recreate the ClasspathStaticHttpHandler > > just by using whatever was auto-generated as a subclass by the IDE. All > > the important code in it was written from scratch, but deleting the file > > and commenting out > > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/blob/ > master/stack/launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/usergrid/ > launcher/Server.java#L159 > > will get us there the fastest. > > > > Ed > > > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 2:29 PM, John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > > > > Ok, I think I see what happened. > > > > > > However, i'm going back to my original question - is this really > > > used/needed? > > > > > > I can only find one css file that makes it into the rest app build. > > > > > > The JSPs get wrapped into grizzly directly - no source code. Unless you > > > want to say that Server might be from questioanble locations. > > > > > > It should be easy enough to rewrite if that makes sense, however I > highly > > > doubt that this file is really CDDL/GPL, since most of it looks > innovated > > > and the structure seems to be what's understood from the original > class. > > > > > > On Sun Jan 04 2015 at 5:01:59 PM John D. Ament <[email protected]> > > > wrote: > > > > > >> Are we sure that this is actually a CDDL/GPL licensed file? Is it > > >> possible it was mislabeled? > > >> > > >> I can't find any reference to it in the grizzly code base. If you > > happen > > >> to have the pre-import source code around that would help. > > >> > > >> > > >> On Sun Jan 04 2015 at 4:52:45 PM Ed Anuff <[email protected]> wrote: > > >> > > >>> Are we OK with putting out a 1.0.x release that doesn't have > Standalone > > >>> or Launcher? This seems problematic. > > >>> > > >>> Ed > > >>> On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Rod Simpson <[email protected]> > > wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> The launcher is really just for convenience when initially playing > > >>>> around with Usergrid. I haven’t used it for a while and it may or > may > > not > > >>>> even work fully. It certainly isn’t integral to the system. I would > > be > > >>>> fine with omitting it from this release. > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> Rod > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Rod Simpson > > >>>> T @rockerston > > >>>> W rodsimpson.com > > >>>> > > >>>> On January 4, 2015 at 1:04:30 PM, John D. Ament ( > > [email protected]) > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> Yes, this is short term for the 1.0.1 release (can't ship it with > the > > >>>> licensing state as is). > > >>>> > > >>>> According to the code, it looks like it's only used for css, but > that > > >>>> could > > >>>> be a naming thing... > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/blob/ > > >>>> master/stack/launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/usergrid/ > > >>>> launcher/Server.java#L159 > > >>>> > > >>>> Does anyone know who this is and if we have an SGA (or equiv) from > > >>>> him/her? > > >>>> > > >>>> https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/blob/ > > >>>> master/stack/launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/usergrid/ > > >>>> launcher/EmbeddedServerHelper.java#L20 > > >>>> > > >>>> I do have to ask, can we excluse the laucher from the release? > > >>>> > > >>>> John > > >>>> > > >>>> On Sun Jan 04 2015 at 2:53:06 PM Ed Anuff <[email protected]> wrote: > > >>>> > > >>>> > I thought this was for the 1.0.1 release though. Regardless of > what > > we > > >>>> > want to do in 2.0, doesn't the current Launcher in 1.0 fire up an > > >>>> embedded > > >>>> > web server that serves, among other things, a few JSPs, CSS files, > > >>>> etc? I > > >>>> > understand the desire to blow aware the standalone server and > > >>>> launcher in > > >>>> > favor of other mechanisms (although I do think that will result in > > >>>> this > > >>>> > being harder, not easier, for people to run locally), which is > fine > > >>>> for > > >>>> > ticket 308, but what about 1.0.x? > > >>>> > > > >>>> > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Nate McCall <[email protected]> > > >>>> wrote: > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > > Agreed. The launcher is getting an overhaul in the 2.0 branch, > > we > > >>>> just > > >>>> > > > haven't decided what that is. > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > Is there a Jira issue for this yet? I have some ideas (see > below) > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > We've found the embedded Cassandra to be > > >>>> > > > problematic, so we're open to ideas of ways to create a more > > >>>> usable > > >>>> > > > standalone distro that utilizes the war binary created with > our > > >>>> release > > >>>> > > > process. > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > I don't think this is a realistic goal given the complexity. > > Running > > >>>> > > this as a "fat jar" application and forking Cassandra to it's > own > > >>>> > > process would be the sanest approach. > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > Them's my $0.02 - let's do discussion on a ticket though. > Couldn't > > >>>> > > find one, so I created: > > >>>> > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-308 > > >>>> > > > > >>>> > > > >>>> > > >>> > > >
