Are we OK with putting out a 1.0.x release that doesn't have Standalone or Launcher? This seems problematic.
Ed On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 12:08 PM, Rod Simpson <[email protected]> wrote: > The launcher is really just for convenience when initially playing around > with Usergrid. I haven’t used it for a while and it may or may not even > work fully. It certainly isn’t integral to the system. I would be fine > with omitting it from this release. > > > Rod > > > > -- > Rod Simpson > T @rockerston > W rodsimpson.com > > On January 4, 2015 at 1:04:30 PM, John D. Ament ([email protected]) > wrote: > > Yes, this is short term for the 1.0.1 release (can't ship it with the > licensing state as is). > > According to the code, it looks like it's only used for css, but that could > be a naming thing... > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/blob/master/stack/launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/usergrid/launcher/Server.java#L159 > > Does anyone know who this is and if we have an SGA (or equiv) from him/her? > > > https://github.com/apache/incubator-usergrid/blob/master/stack/launcher/src/main/java/org/apache/usergrid/launcher/EmbeddedServerHelper.java#L20 > > I do have to ask, can we excluse the laucher from the release? > > John > > On Sun Jan 04 2015 at 2:53:06 PM Ed Anuff <[email protected]> wrote: > > > I thought this was for the 1.0.1 release though. Regardless of what we > > want to do in 2.0, doesn't the current Launcher in 1.0 fire up an > embedded > > web server that serves, among other things, a few JSPs, CSS files, etc? I > > understand the desire to blow aware the standalone server and launcher in > > favor of other mechanisms (although I do think that will result in this > > being harder, not easier, for people to run locally), which is fine for > > ticket 308, but what about 1.0.x? > > > > On Sun, Jan 4, 2015 at 11:41 AM, Nate McCall <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > Agreed. The launcher is getting an overhaul in the 2.0 branch, we > just > > > > haven't decided what that is. > > > > > > Is there a Jira issue for this yet? I have some ideas (see below) > > > > > > > We've found the embedded Cassandra to be > > > > problematic, so we're open to ideas of ways to create a more usable > > > > standalone distro that utilizes the war binary created with our > release > > > > process. > > > > > > I don't think this is a realistic goal given the complexity. Running > > > this as a "fat jar" application and forking Cassandra to it's own > > > process would be the sanest approach. > > > > > > Them's my $0.02 - let's do discussion on a ticket though. Couldn't > > > find one, so I created: > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/USERGRID-308 > > > > > >
