First off, I am really happy that we are improving the documentation for VXQuery. This will help future developers understand VXQuery much better.
I had the documentation ready for a different xml doc. But it won't take much to incorporate this one. This documentation will be available in my next patch, hopefully in a week or two from now. Thanks, Shivani ᐧ On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks pretty good to me. > We’re got a document node, 3 element nodes, an attribute node, a comment > node, a processing instruction, and a text node. > The only thing that seems to be missing (didn’t realize that before) are > namespaces! > So maybe we can change it to be this: > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > <catalog xmlns:ex="http://example.org/"; > > <ex:book isbn="0812416139"> > <!--top secret--> > <title>Macbeth</title> > <?hide?> > </ex:book> > </catalog> > > Cheers, > Till > > > > On May 1, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Eldon Carman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > In an effort to improve our documentation, Shivani suggested adding a > > commented XDM representation for a sample XML document on our website. > Till > > suggested the document include all the different types of elements that > can > > be in a XML document (attribute, comments, etc.). Here is a suggested XML > > document: > > > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > > <catelog> > > <book "title"="007"> > > <!--top secret--> > > <foo>bar</foo> > > <?hide?> > > </book> > > </catelog> > > > > Does this provide enough variety to make a complete example? > >
