That was a very basic structure. Looking forward to have this going! Thanks, Shivani
On Saturday, May 2, 2015, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi Shivani, > > Sorry, didn’t know that you were already done. > > Thanks for incorporating the changes! > Till > > > On May 2, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Shivani Mall <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > > First off, I am really happy that we are improving the documentation for > > VXQuery. This will help future developers understand VXQuery much better. > > > > I had the documentation ready for a different xml doc. But it won't take > > much to incorporate this one. This documentation will be available in my > > next patch, hopefully in a week or two from now. > > > > Thanks, > > Shivani > > ᐧ > > > > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > > > >> Looks pretty good to me. > >> We’re got a document node, 3 element nodes, an attribute node, a comment > >> node, a processing instruction, and a text node. > >> The only thing that seems to be missing (didn’t realize that before) are > >> namespaces! > >> So maybe we can change it to be this: > >> > >> <?xml version="1.0"?> > >> <catalog xmlns:ex="http://example.org/"; > > >> <ex:book isbn="0812416139"> > >> <!--top secret--> > >> <title>Macbeth</title> > >> <?hide?> > >> </ex:book> > >> </catalog> > >> > >> Cheers, > >> Till > >> > >> > >>> On May 1, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Eldon Carman <[email protected] > <javascript:;>> wrote: > >>> > >>> In an effort to improve our documentation, Shivani suggested adding a > >>> commented XDM representation for a sample XML document on our website. > >> Till > >>> suggested the document include all the different types of elements that > >> can > >>> be in a XML document (attribute, comments, etc.). Here is a suggested > XML > >>> document: > >>> > >>> <?xml version="1.0"?> > >>> <catelog> > >>> <book "title"="007"> > >>> <!--top secret--> > >>> <foo>bar</foo> > >>> <?hide?> > >>> </book> > >>> </catelog> > >>> > >>> Does this provide enough variety to make a complete example? > >> > >> > >
