Hi Shivani, Sorry, didn’t know that you were already done.
Thanks for incorporating the changes! Till > On May 2, 2015, at 1:21 PM, Shivani Mall <[email protected]> wrote: > > First off, I am really happy that we are improving the documentation for > VXQuery. This will help future developers understand VXQuery much better. > > I had the documentation ready for a different xml doc. But it won't take > much to incorporate this one. This documentation will be available in my > next patch, hopefully in a week or two from now. > > Thanks, > Shivani > ᐧ > > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Looks pretty good to me. >> We’re got a document node, 3 element nodes, an attribute node, a comment >> node, a processing instruction, and a text node. >> The only thing that seems to be missing (didn’t realize that before) are >> namespaces! >> So maybe we can change it to be this: >> >> <?xml version="1.0"?> >> <catalog xmlns:ex="http://example.org/"; > >> <ex:book isbn="0812416139"> >> <!--top secret--> >> <title>Macbeth</title> >> <?hide?> >> </ex:book> >> </catalog> >> >> Cheers, >> Till >> >> >>> On May 1, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Eldon Carman <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> In an effort to improve our documentation, Shivani suggested adding a >>> commented XDM representation for a sample XML document on our website. >> Till >>> suggested the document include all the different types of elements that >> can >>> be in a XML document (attribute, comments, etc.). Here is a suggested XML >>> document: >>> >>> <?xml version="1.0"?> >>> <catelog> >>> <book "title"="007"> >>> <!--top secret--> >>> <foo>bar</foo> >>> <?hide?> >>> </book> >>> </catelog> >>> >>> Does this provide enough variety to make a complete example? >> >>
