Looks good! (And slightly better spelling in v2...😃) On May 2, 2015 1:48 PM, "Shivani Mall" <[email protected]> wrote:
> First off, I am really happy that we are improving the documentation for > VXQuery. This will help future developers understand VXQuery much better. > > I had the documentation ready for a different xml doc. But it won't take > much to incorporate this one. This documentation will be available in my > next patch, hopefully in a week or two from now. > > Thanks, > Shivani > ᐧ > > On Sat, May 2, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Till Westmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Looks pretty good to me. > > We’re got a document node, 3 element nodes, an attribute node, a comment > > node, a processing instruction, and a text node. > > The only thing that seems to be missing (didn’t realize that before) are > > namespaces! > > So maybe we can change it to be this: > > > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > > <catalog xmlns:ex="http://example.org/"; > > > <ex:book isbn="0812416139"> > > <!--top secret--> > > <title>Macbeth</title> > > <?hide?> > > </ex:book> > > </catalog> > > > > Cheers, > > Till > > > > > > > On May 1, 2015, at 5:10 PM, Eldon Carman <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > > > In an effort to improve our documentation, Shivani suggested adding a > > > commented XDM representation for a sample XML document on our website. > > Till > > > suggested the document include all the different types of elements that > > can > > > be in a XML document (attribute, comments, etc.). Here is a suggested > XML > > > document: > > > > > > <?xml version="1.0"?> > > > <catelog> > > > <book "title"="007"> > > > <!--top secret--> > > > <foo>bar</foo> > > > <?hide?> > > > </book> > > > </catelog> > > > > > > Does this provide enough variety to make a complete example? > > > > >
