Hi,
>Kay Schenk wrote: > >>>> We are forced to compromise. It has little to do with >>>> SourceCast, as it happens, and a lot to do with the basic legacy >>>> architecture of the project. >>> >> Well we are forced to compromise anyway, SourceCast or not! > >Hehe, damn! :D But what is this basic legacy architecture? Who decides, >or who is into this dicussion whether the website should be more >enduser-centric or developper-centric? What do you mean by "website"? And, as I pointed out, we are bound less by technology than by legacy. We are all the same striving to be more accessible to endusers. For insight into how other parts of OOo have managed this, you might want to look at some of the Native-language projects (<http://projects.openoffice.org/native-lang.html>). Many are quite creeative in their solutions, and they are also mainly dealing with endusers though want (always) developers. So, to summarise, the www/index.html is pretty much ours to alter, though we do have, as I stated, the requisites. > >>> Or should we try to define a new style, and might this be picked up >>> by OOo? >> >> What do you mean by this? "define a new style"???? > >Don't think I have really rigourous plans for a new style, but I was >thinking that there might be some kind of house-style (which is imho >more than one should use the sun-logo, the gulls and the official OOo >logo). I think that however the graphics by Nicu for example do have a >certain style, and I am happy to live with these :) We don't have a firm one, though we do have the convention of some colors for blue and table styles. (See <http://www.openoffice.org/styles/>.) We could develop one, to be sure, and I personally would love for that; the styles link was meant to be an early start. The idea is also to allow maximum freedom while maintaning identity. Cheers Louis --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
