yep! both of these work pretty well! and will work for ANY browser!

Miikka Leskinen wrote:
On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:28:59 +0300, "Miikka Leskinen"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

On Thu, 28 Apr 2005 16:46:00 +0400, "Louis Suarez-Potts"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:

http://www.justis.com/support/faq-cache.html#firefox


thanks. But I meant is there something we could write into our pages
that forces a user's firefox to refresh its cache?


<meta http-equiv="Pragma" content="No-Cache" />

This could do it. It tells the browsers that cache shouldn't be used,
but the request should be made directly to the server.

It's HTTP-EQUIV which means that it's meant for the server. In other
words: server configuration that the server catches from the XHTML code
(like Content-Type and all that). So check that the server is really
reading these META tags.

Don't know how this works in practice though. :) I think the
cache-or-no-cache choice should be made by the user agent, not the
server (??).


Oh, forgot to mention...

You can also try <meta http-equiv="Expires" content="0" />.

It means the page immediately expires in the cache. This way, the
browser should always consider using the cache as a bad choice and
always fetch the page from the server instead.

But that's more like a hack, and not a "real" solution (abuse of
"Expires" meta tag).


best
Louis


Miikka Leskinen miles_fin


Regards, Miikka Leskinen

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


-- =========================================================== Kay Schenk

"Here's all you have to know about men and women:
 women are crazy, men are stupid.
 And the main reason women are crazy is that men are stupid."
                                           -- George Carlin

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]



Reply via email to