Hi *, On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 07:19:22PM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:43 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 06:21:07PM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:05 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:39:45PM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > > > > On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 22:58 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 04:43:03PM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > You do have a problem don't you. > > > > Yes. I have a problem. I have a problem with you. Or better: With your > > way to responing on requests for more information to deal with a > > specific problem you have. > > [...] > > As yes the setup guide. You only wanted to have your way. In fact I > found you so insistent it was annoying.
Again not true. All I wantes was an answer (some profound arguments) why you did not want to use my suggestion. I asked a couple of times, but you did not answer. Same here. I ask for more information, but you refuse to provide that information. > So I see this as you can't get > your way you become offensive and less help, if that is what you were > trying to provide, as time went on. Well the setup guide does have what > you wanted now that things stabilized as I said it would. Yes. It settled, but still you did not give a reason why you did not use -Uhv from the beginning, or more precise: Why did the setup read "upgrading is not recommended for beta builds". Still this is unanswered. And /that/ was the point I insisted on being clarified. That did not happen. > So what is your point that I disagreed with you and are thus a target. > GET A LIFE. Start reading what is /written/ and not what you believe to be the intent of the writer. > [...] > THis thread is one of your making. Not mine. YOu have tried to take > shots. However I get it now. When anyone disagrees with you or asks for > justification of your actions, you take offence. Too bad. YOu didn't > answer so I lost interest. Don't turn around the facts. I asked, you didn't provide the answer, so *I* lost interest. The rest is just the usual bla-bla. > If you bring QA into the mix I have a problem > with how you work. You go out of your way to dismiss issues and provide > no information. Get a life. A decent argument. Write unclear reports, don't respond to the questions you were asked, but immediately accuse the people that actually are trying to help to be some worthless piece of sh*t without a life. No wonder that noone drives the issue further. Nobody likes to be insulted. When the reporter is non-cooperative, the only way out is to close the issue. Otherwise it is a waste of time. > Again as far as this thread goes if you are not going to do anything, > please leave it. You have a real problem that nothing I can do or say > will change to remedy. Look at yourself before you start taking shots at > others. Again. Just read what is/was written, don't read what you guess the author wrote. ciao Christian -- NP: Linkin Park - Don't Stay --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
