On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 16:38 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 09:25:05AM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 13:25 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 07:19:22PM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:43 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 06:21:07PM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > > [setup-guide] > > > Yes. It settled, but still you did not give a reason why you did not use > > > -Uhv from the beginning, or more precise: Why did the setup read > > > "upgrading is not recommended for beta builds". Still this is > > > unanswered. And /that/ was the point I insisted on being clarified. That > > > did not happen. > > > > SUre I did, I said I thought doing so was premature. You then started to > > order that it be done. Ordering is not asking. > > No. You did not. The question is and was: Why did you add that *at all*, > for what reason did you add that. Again: Why did you add "Upgrading not > recommended for beta builds" at all? You never answered this one. >
I made a choice. > > > [...] > > > I asked, you didn't provide the answer, so *I* lost interest. The rest > > > is just the usual bla-bla. > > > > Asked? I do not think so. > > "Tell us before where you found these links." > > If you don't see this as a request for more information (=asking for the > link), then I cannot help you. > I can see you have trouble with the message. It was forwarded from users with full headers. Ask the OP seems a reasonable thing to do as his email address was there. Like I said before, all I did was forward the message. > > > > If you bring QA into the mix I have a problem > > > > with how you work. You go out of your way to dismiss issues and provide > > > > no information. Get a life. > > > > > > A decent argument. Write unclear reports, don't respond to the > > > questions you were asked, but immediately accuse the people that > > > actually are trying to help to be some worthless piece of sh*t without a > > > life. No wonder that noone drives the issue further. Nobody likes to be > > > insulted. > > > > > > When the reporter is non-cooperative, the only way out is to close the > > > issue. Otherwise it is a waste of time. > > > > > > > I see your manners have not improved. > > I don't like to butter s.o. up. That's all. > > > I have never called you any names > > If you define "manners" by not mentioning some words explicitly, then > again this is a fundamental differnce between us two. > > > I have simply not accepted that your opinions, et cetera are the be all > > and end all. This seems to annoy you that what you write anywhere is not > > taken as the only truth. > > Again: I'm not refering to this thread alone, neither to the setup-guide > thing alone. > It has been vitually everydiscussion with you where I was involved, in > about every issue with your footprint I came across. Every communication with you has been a challenge or order. I see no point to your approach. Why should I respond to every challenge you make when it in non-productive and only serves to make for animosity. > > > > > Again as far as this thread goes if you are not going to do anything, > > > > please leave it. You have a real problem that nothing I can do or say > > > > will change to remedy. Look at yourself before you start taking shots at > > > > others. > > > > > > Again. Just read what is/was written, don't read what you guess the > > > author wrote. > > > > No your read. If you cannot read and understand a report, that is your > > problem. > > No. If I cannot understand a report and ask for more information but > don't get the necessary information, I close the issue. Done. It is > *your* problem if you're not willing to provide the information. > > > I only belong to the mailing list. I cannot troubleshoot for > > those who have access. You have access, it is your job to either take on > > the task or not. > > You have the same access as I have. You may not be able to commit > changes, but this is not necessary to "troubleshoot". > > I won't spend my time investigating something for 2 hours if the > reporter could simply give me the URL. > > > Trying to shift the problem to someone who is not in a > > position to help and then calling them names shows a certain immaturity. > > What names did I call you? > > > You know you are coming across to me as a petulant child that can not > > get his own way just like in all our other encounters. Yours is not the > > final word on anything. > > Your "tactic" is always talking bla-bla-bla, putting things done on > immatureness or other charachter-"failures" instead of giving facts, > instead of simply answering the questions you were asked. You are still at it. I have no patience for this thread. Be right or whatever when every message I post is challenged by you in the most silly manner. My choice it to ignore you except when you post incorrect information or start nit picking. Your have nit picked enough yet again and still have not solved the problem. Others as always have done it for you. -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
