On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 13:25 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > Hi *, > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 07:19:22PM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:43 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 06:21:07PM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > > > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:05 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 05:39:45PM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > > > > > On Fri, 2005-11-04 at 22:58 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > > > > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 04:43:03PM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton > > > > > > > wrote: > > > > > > > > You do have a problem don't you. > > > > > > Yes. I have a problem. I have a problem with you. Or better: With your > > > way to responing on requests for more information to deal with a > > > specific problem you have. > > > [...] > > > > As yes the setup guide. You only wanted to have your way. In fact I > > found you so insistent it was annoying. > > Again not true. All I wantes was an answer (some profound arguments) why > you did not want to use my suggestion. I asked a couple of times, but > you did not answer. Same here. I ask for more information, but you > refuse to provide that information. > > > So I see this as you can't get > > your way you become offensive and less help, if that is what you were > > trying to provide, as time went on. Well the setup guide does have what > > you wanted now that things stabilized as I said it would. > > Yes. It settled, but still you did not give a reason why you did not use > -Uhv from the beginning, or more precise: Why did the setup read > "upgrading is not recommended for beta builds". Still this is > unanswered. And /that/ was the point I insisted on being clarified. That > did not happen.
SUre I did, I said I thought doing so was premature. You then started to order that it be done. Ordering is not asking. > > > So what is your point that I disagreed with you and are thus a target. > > GET A LIFE. > > Start reading what is /written/ and not what you believe to be the > intent of the writer. > I can see that you want to have your own way. So be it. > > [...] > > THis thread is one of your making. Not mine. YOu have tried to take > > shots. However I get it now. When anyone disagrees with you or asks for > > justification of your actions, you take offence. Too bad. YOu didn't > > answer so I lost interest. > > Don't turn around the facts. More FUD. I posted the issue to have it reviewed for an OP who has trouble with Tracker. I saw the problem myself and added comments to that effect. I did find that started the problem. I lost interest because there was no interest in the problem. > > I asked, you didn't provide the answer, so *I* lost interest. The rest > is just the usual bla-bla. Asked? I do not think so. > > > If you bring QA into the mix I have a problem > > with how you work. You go out of your way to dismiss issues and provide > > no information. Get a life. > > A decent argument. Write unclear reports, don't respond to the > questions you were asked, but immediately accuse the people that > actually are trying to help to be some worthless piece of sh*t without a > life. No wonder that noone drives the issue further. Nobody likes to be > insulted. > > When the reporter is non-cooperative, the only way out is to close the > issue. Otherwise it is a waste of time. > I see your manners have not improved. I have never called you any names I have simply not accepted that your opinions, et cetera are the be all and end all. This seems to annoy you that what you write anywhere is not taken as the only truth. > > Again as far as this thread goes if you are not going to do anything, > > please leave it. You have a real problem that nothing I can do or say > > will change to remedy. Look at yourself before you start taking shots at > > others. > > Again. Just read what is/was written, don't read what you guess the > author wrote. No your read. If you cannot read and understand a report, that is your problem. I only belong to the mailing list. I cannot troubleshoot for those who have access. You have access, it is your job to either take on the task or not. Trying to shift the problem to someone who is not in a position to help and then calling them names shows a certain immaturity. You know you are coming across to me as a petulant child that can not get his own way just like in all our other encounters. Yours is not the final word on anything. -- PLEASE KEEP MESSAGES ON THE LIST. OpenOffice.org Documentation Co-Lead http://documentation.openoffice.org/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
