On Sat, Nov 05, 2005 at 09:25:05AM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 13:25 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 07:19:22PM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > > On Sat, 2005-11-05 at 00:43 +0100, Christian Lohmaier wrote: > > > > On Fri, Nov 04, 2005 at 06:21:07PM -0500, G. Roderick Singleton wrote: > > [setup-guide] > > Yes. It settled, but still you did not give a reason why you did not use > > -Uhv from the beginning, or more precise: Why did the setup read > > "upgrading is not recommended for beta builds". Still this is > > unanswered. And /that/ was the point I insisted on being clarified. That > > did not happen. > > SUre I did, I said I thought doing so was premature. You then started to > order that it be done. Ordering is not asking.
No. You did not. The question is and was: Why did you add that *at all*, for what reason did you add that. Again: Why did you add "Upgrading not recommended for beta builds" at all? You never answered this one. > > [...] > > I asked, you didn't provide the answer, so *I* lost interest. The rest > > is just the usual bla-bla. > > Asked? I do not think so. "Tell us before where you found these links." If you don't see this as a request for more information (=asking for the link), then I cannot help you. > > > If you bring QA into the mix I have a problem > > > with how you work. You go out of your way to dismiss issues and provide > > > no information. Get a life. > > > > A decent argument. Write unclear reports, don't respond to the > > questions you were asked, but immediately accuse the people that > > actually are trying to help to be some worthless piece of sh*t without a > > life. No wonder that noone drives the issue further. Nobody likes to be > > insulted. > > > > When the reporter is non-cooperative, the only way out is to close the > > issue. Otherwise it is a waste of time. > > > > I see your manners have not improved. I don't like to butter s.o. up. That's all. > I have never called you any names If you define "manners" by not mentioning some words explicitly, then again this is a fundamental differnce between us two. > I have simply not accepted that your opinions, et cetera are the be all > and end all. This seems to annoy you that what you write anywhere is not > taken as the only truth. Again: I'm not refering to this thread alone, neither to the setup-guide thing alone. It has been vitually everydiscussion with you where I was involved, in about every issue with your footprint I came across. > > > Again as far as this thread goes if you are not going to do anything, > > > please leave it. You have a real problem that nothing I can do or say > > > will change to remedy. Look at yourself before you start taking shots at > > > others. > > > > Again. Just read what is/was written, don't read what you guess the > > author wrote. > > No your read. If you cannot read and understand a report, that is your > problem. No. If I cannot understand a report and ask for more information but don't get the necessary information, I close the issue. Done. It is *your* problem if you're not willing to provide the information. > I only belong to the mailing list. I cannot troubleshoot for > those who have access. You have access, it is your job to either take on > the task or not. You have the same access as I have. You may not be able to commit changes, but this is not necessary to "troubleshoot". I won't spend my time investigating something for 2 hours if the reporter could simply give me the URL. > Trying to shift the problem to someone who is not in a > position to help and then calling them names shows a certain immaturity. What names did I call you? > You know you are coming across to me as a petulant child that can not > get his own way just like in all our other encounters. Yours is not the > final word on anything. Your "tactic" is always talking bla-bla-bla, putting things done on immatureness or other charachter-"failures" instead of giving facts, instead of simply answering the questions you were asked. ciao Christian -- NP: Metallica - Better Than You --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
