On Thu, 22 Nov 2007, Kay Koll wrote: > Hi Randy, > > Thanks for the update but I like your previous more than this one. You > previous proposal was clean and straight forward. > First of all the footer, the list of open source project might cause the > wrong impression that these applications are mandatory to use OO.o. > > I am also dislike the list of OO.o component icons, they are in my > opinion not necessary.
I have to disagree here. The problem with the OOo main page (for the longest time) was that there was no way to find out what you get when you download OOo. I'm still not pleased with the way the components have been shoved to the side on the current page, but they are an absolute necessity. Remember, not everyone coming to the main page is coming in to join the community -- I'd be willing to bet that most people are coming to find out "what is OpenOffice.org, what does it consist of, and what can it do for *me*?" > You have also removed news section, which is important for me. The news is important, in that it lets people know that OOo is actively being talked about/used. -- J. David Eisenberg http://catcode.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
