On 8 October 2017 at 22:29, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey Team, > > Sorry I am missing the context here. What’s up? How can I help?
This is related to the checks here: https://whimsy.apache.org/site/ > Cheers, > Chris > > > > > On 10/8/17, 3:41 AM, "Shane Curcuru" <[email protected]> wrote: > > sebb wrote on 10/8/17 6:29 AM: > > Some of the website checks don't have pointers to documentation: > > > > events > > Rich, do you have a public written URL that requires (or asks) projects > to include the code snippet for the apachecon events listing? Or is > this not maintained currently? > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/events/README.txt > > > image > This is Sally as VP, Marketing & Publicity, since she owns the a.o > homepage. I don't know if it's a requirement yet, but it's used to > generate links on the homepage; so projects without an image there will > look pretty dumb with an image placeholder. I'll ask her. > > See also: > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/img/HEADER.html > > > copyright > This would be Chris as VP, Legal, I presume. I never thought about it, > but I believe it's important and should absolutely be a requirement. > > > I assume there are reasons for including these checks, in which case > > the doc links are needed. > > > > Anyone know where to find these requirements? > > > > If not, the checks should be dropped from the analysis/display (if not > > the extraction phase) > > > > No, they should not be dropped, because they are still clearly useful - > although UI to mark them separately would be fine. I.e. the "image" may > not (yet) be an ASF *requirement*, it's still an important thing to have > a check for. > > -- > > - Shane > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources > > >
