I’m sorry, but I still don’t get it:
> copyright
> This would be Chris as VP, Legal, I presume. I never thought about
it,
> but I believe it's important and should absolutely be a requirement.
>
Huh?
Sorry this is not me being difficult or dense, I’m literally missing the
context here, and replying with one sentence answers isn’t providing it.
Cheers,
Chris
On 10/8/17, 3:07 PM, "sebb" <[email protected]> wrote:
On 8 October 2017 at 23:00, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> wrote:
> Cool page!
>
> What does this have to do with Legal?
See Shane's reply earlier in the thread.
> Cheers,
> Chris
>
>
>
>
> On 10/8/17, 2:42 PM, "sebb" <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> On 8 October 2017 at 22:29, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]>
wrote:
> > Hey Team,
> >
> > Sorry I am missing the context here. What’s up? How can I help?
>
> This is related to the checks here:
>
> https://whimsy.apache.org/site/
>
> > Cheers,
> > Chris
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > On 10/8/17, 3:41 AM, "Shane Curcuru" <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > sebb wrote on 10/8/17 6:29 AM:
> > > Some of the website checks don't have pointers to
documentation:
> > >
> > > events
> >
> > Rich, do you have a public written URL that requires (or asks)
projects
> > to include the code snippet for the apachecon events listing?
Or is
> > this not maintained currently?
> >
> >
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/events/README.txt
> >
> > > image
> > This is Sally as VP, Marketing & Publicity, since she owns the
a.o
> > homepage. I don't know if it's a requirement yet, but it's
used to
> > generate links on the homepage; so projects without an image
there will
> > look pretty dumb with an image placeholder. I'll ask her.
> >
> > See also:
> >
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/img/HEADER.html
> >
> > > copyright
> > This would be Chris as VP, Legal, I presume. I never thought
about it,
> > but I believe it's important and should absolutely be a
requirement.
> >
> > > I assume there are reasons for including these checks, in
which case
> > > the doc links are needed.
> > >
> > > Anyone know where to find these requirements?
> > >
> > > If not, the checks should be dropped from the
analysis/display (if not
> > > the extraction phase)
> > >
> >
> > No, they should not be dropped, because they are still clearly
useful -
> > although UI to mark them separately would be fine. I.e. the
"image" may
> > not (yet) be an ASF *requirement*, it's still an important
thing to have
> > a check for.
> >
> > --
> >
> > - Shane
> > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
> >
> >
> >
>
>
>
