Cool page!

What does this have to do with Legal?

Cheers,
Chris




On 10/8/17, 2:42 PM, "sebb" <[email protected]> wrote:

    On 8 October 2017 at 22:29, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> wrote:
    > Hey Team,
    >
    > Sorry I am missing the context here. What’s up? How can I help?
    
    This is related to the checks here:
    
    https://whimsy.apache.org/site/
    
    > Cheers,
    > Chris
    >
    >
    >
    >
    > On 10/8/17, 3:41 AM, "Shane Curcuru" <[email protected]> wrote:
    >
    >     sebb wrote on 10/8/17 6:29 AM:
    >     > Some of the website checks don't have pointers to documentation:
    >     >
    >     > events
    >
    >     Rich, do you have a public written URL that requires (or asks) 
projects
    >     to include the code snippet for the apachecon events listing?  Or is
    >     this not maintained currently?
    >
    >     
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/events/README.txt
    >
    >     > image
    >     This is Sally as VP, Marketing & Publicity, since she owns the a.o
    >     homepage.  I don't know if it's a requirement yet, but it's used to
    >     generate links on the homepage; so projects without an image there 
will
    >     look pretty dumb with an image placeholder.  I'll ask her.
    >
    >     See also:
    >     
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/img/HEADER.html
    >
    >     > copyright
    >     This would be Chris as VP, Legal, I presume.  I never thought about 
it,
    >     but I believe it's important and should absolutely be a requirement.
    >
    >     > I assume there are reasons for including these checks, in which case
    >     > the doc links are needed.
    >     >
    >     > Anyone know where to find these requirements?
    >     >
    >     > If not, the checks should be dropped from the analysis/display (if 
not
    >     > the extraction phase)
    >     >
    >
    >     No, they should not be dropped, because they are still clearly useful 
-
    >     although UI to mark them separately would be fine.  I.e. the "image" 
may
    >     not (yet) be an ASF *requirement*, it's still an important thing to 
have
    >     a check for.
    >
    >     --
    >
    >     - Shane
    >       https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources
    >
    >
    >
    


Reply via email to