The "copyright" refers back to my original e-mail, which said that some checks such as "copyright" check does not have a pointer to the documentation.
For example, the following page shows what the check is, but gives no doc link: https://whimsy.apache.org/site/check/copyright Compare that with the sponsorship page, which shows the check and a link to the documentation: https://whimsy.apache.org/site/check/sponsorship On 9 October 2017 at 00:15, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> wrote: > I’m sorry, but I still don’t get it: > > > copyright > > This would be Chris as VP, Legal, I presume. I never thought > about it, > > but I believe it's important and should absolutely be a > requirement. > > > > Huh? > > Sorry this is not me being difficult or dense, I’m literally missing the > context here, and replying with one sentence answers isn’t providing it. > > Cheers, > Chris > > > > On 10/8/17, 3:07 PM, "sebb" <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 8 October 2017 at 23:00, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > Cool page! > > > > What does this have to do with Legal? > > See Shane's reply earlier in the thread. > > > Cheers, > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > On 10/8/17, 2:42 PM, "sebb" <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > On 8 October 2017 at 22:29, Chris Mattmann <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > Hey Team, > > > > > > Sorry I am missing the context here. What’s up? How can I help? > > > > This is related to the checks here: > > > > https://whimsy.apache.org/site/ > > > > > Cheers, > > > Chris > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 10/8/17, 3:41 AM, "Shane Curcuru" <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > > > sebb wrote on 10/8/17 6:29 AM: > > > > Some of the website checks don't have pointers to > documentation: > > > > > > > > events > > > > > > Rich, do you have a public written URL that requires (or > asks) projects > > > to include the code snippet for the apachecon events listing? > Or is > > > this not maintained currently? > > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/events/README.txt > > > > > > > image > > > This is Sally as VP, Marketing & Publicity, since she owns > the a.o > > > homepage. I don't know if it's a requirement yet, but it's > used to > > > generate links on the homepage; so projects without an image > there will > > > look pretty dumb with an image placeholder. I'll ask her. > > > > > > See also: > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/infrastructure/site/trunk/content/img/HEADER.html > > > > > > > copyright > > > This would be Chris as VP, Legal, I presume. I never thought > about it, > > > but I believe it's important and should absolutely be a > requirement. > > > > > > > I assume there are reasons for including these checks, in > which case > > > > the doc links are needed. > > > > > > > > Anyone know where to find these requirements? > > > > > > > > If not, the checks should be dropped from the > analysis/display (if not > > > > the extraction phase) > > > > > > > > > > No, they should not be dropped, because they are still > clearly useful - > > > although UI to mark them separately would be fine. I.e. the > "image" may > > > not (yet) be an ASF *requirement*, it's still an important > thing to have > > > a check for. > > > > > > -- > > > > > > - Shane > > > https://www.apache.org/foundation/marks/resources > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
