no, this is annotation driven form component validation. it's actually remarkably useful.
Ryan Sonnek-2 wrote: > > This is great to hear. > > out of curiosity, what kind of annotation validation does it support? > is this similar to the wicketstuff-hibernate project? if so, it might > be worth putting in wicketstuff and trying to create an abstraction to > support both Hibernate and JPA annotations. > > I think facebook support could go to wicketstuff as well. although > it's a high visibility project, I think that the same could be said of > the wicketstuff gmap or other projects. > > On Nov 22, 2007 3:01 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: >> > thoof is considering open sourcing these components: >> >> Nice! I would say, put them in: >> >> > - thoof ajax feedback bubbles >> >> -> wicket-extensions >> >> > - annotation-based constraint validation framework (based on sun's >> > constraints framework) >> >> Separate project. It introduces a new dependency right? Are there any >> license issues? >> >> > - facebook support (not complete, but a basic start at addressing this >> > problem) >> >> Depends on how far done it is and whether someone wants to take >> ownership (I know we'll do this as a team, but it would be nice if >> someone would feel responsible for making sure it gets properly >> supported). Is there someone who will be using this in a real project? >> >> > but facebook support might linger in wicket-stuff until it's really >> fully >> > baked. >> >> I'm typically for that approach, though in this case I think it would >> really benefit Wicket if we make this a core project so that we can >> ensure the API meets our standards and it is more high profile to have >> this as a core project; Facebook apps seem to get quite a bit of >> attention lately. >> >> Eelco >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/thoof-open-source-contribution-tf4858158.html#a13902872 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
