well, of course.
Matej Knopp-2 wrote: > > Having facebook support in extensions? Well, this is definitely > something we should agree on first i think. > > -Matej > > On Nov 23, 2007 12:11 AM, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> great. at least eelco and i think it should be wicket-extensions (for >> 1.4) >> because of the importance of it. would you be willing to take it over? >> i will not have time to work on this much. >> >> >> >> Ryan Gravener-2 wrote: >> > >> > I am interested in making wicket work with facebook. I have made some >> > fbml >> > components in wicket, so I am looking forward to seeing the project on >> > wicket-stuff. >> > >> > On 22/11/2007, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> yeah, the contraint framework does have licensing issues. i don't >> >> know how hard it might be to solve this, but i can try some contacts >> >> at sun and see. >> >> >> >> i too would like to see facebook support in wicket as quickly as >> >> possible. >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> Eelco Hillenius wrote: >> >> > >> >> >> thoof is considering open sourcing these components: >> >> > >> >> > Nice! I would say, put them in: >> >> > >> >> >> - thoof ajax feedback bubbles >> >> > >> >> > -> wicket-extensions >> >> > >> >> >> - annotation-based constraint validation framework (based on sun's >> >> >> constraints framework) >> >> > >> >> > Separate project. It introduces a new dependency right? Are there >> any >> >> > license issues? >> >> > >> >> >> - facebook support (not complete, but a basic start at addressing >> >> this >> >> >> problem) >> >> > >> >> > Depends on how far done it is and whether someone wants to take >> >> > ownership (I know we'll do this as a team, but it would be nice if >> >> > someone would feel responsible for making sure it gets properly >> >> > supported). Is there someone who will be using this in a real >> project? >> >> > >> >> >> but facebook support might linger in wicket-stuff until it's really >> >> fully >> >> >> baked. >> >> > >> >> > I'm typically for that approach, though in this case I think it >> would >> >> > really benefit Wicket if we make this a core project so that we can >> >> > ensure the API meets our standards and it is more high profile to >> have >> >> > this as a core project; Facebook apps seem to get quite a bit of >> >> > attention lately. >> >> > >> >> > Eelco >> >> > >> >> > >> >> >> >> -- >> >> View this message in context: >> >> >> http://www.nabble.com/thoof-open-source-contribution-tf4858158.html#a13902989 >> >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> > -- >> > Ryan Gravener >> > >> > >> >> -- >> View this message in context: >> http://www.nabble.com/thoof-open-source-contribution-tf4858158.html#a13904794 >> >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. >> >> > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/thoof-open-source-contribution-tf4858158.html#a13904938 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
