Having facebook support in extensions? Well, this is definitely something we should agree on first i think.
-Matej On Nov 23, 2007 12:11 AM, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > great. at least eelco and i think it should be wicket-extensions (for 1.4) > because of the importance of it. would you be willing to take it over? > i will not have time to work on this much. > > > > Ryan Gravener-2 wrote: > > > > I am interested in making wicket work with facebook. I have made some > > fbml > > components in wicket, so I am looking forward to seeing the project on > > wicket-stuff. > > > > On 22/11/2007, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> > >> > >> yeah, the contraint framework does have licensing issues. i don't > >> know how hard it might be to solve this, but i can try some contacts > >> at sun and see. > >> > >> i too would like to see facebook support in wicket as quickly as > >> possible. > >> > >> > >> > >> Eelco Hillenius wrote: > >> > > >> >> thoof is considering open sourcing these components: > >> > > >> > Nice! I would say, put them in: > >> > > >> >> - thoof ajax feedback bubbles > >> > > >> > -> wicket-extensions > >> > > >> >> - annotation-based constraint validation framework (based on sun's > >> >> constraints framework) > >> > > >> > Separate project. It introduces a new dependency right? Are there any > >> > license issues? > >> > > >> >> - facebook support (not complete, but a basic start at addressing > >> this > >> >> problem) > >> > > >> > Depends on how far done it is and whether someone wants to take > >> > ownership (I know we'll do this as a team, but it would be nice if > >> > someone would feel responsible for making sure it gets properly > >> > supported). Is there someone who will be using this in a real project? > >> > > >> >> but facebook support might linger in wicket-stuff until it's really > >> fully > >> >> baked. > >> > > >> > I'm typically for that approach, though in this case I think it would > >> > really benefit Wicket if we make this a core project so that we can > >> > ensure the API meets our standards and it is more high profile to have > >> > this as a core project; Facebook apps seem to get quite a bit of > >> > attention lately. > >> > > >> > Eelco > >> > > >> > > >> > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://www.nabble.com/thoof-open-source-contribution-tf4858158.html#a13902989 > >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > Ryan Gravener > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: > http://www.nabble.com/thoof-open-source-contribution-tf4858158.html#a13904794 > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
