oh, ok. wicket-stuff is easier for now. maybe i should just put all three projects in there for now.
Eelco Hillenius wrote: > >> great. at least eelco and i think it should be wicket-extensions (for >> 1.4) >> because of the importance of it. would you be willing to take it over? >> i will not have time to work on this much. > > I was thinking about a separate core project actually, not extensions > since this would introduce a separate dependency and it is very > specific for one project. > > If Ryan wants to help out, it is best to make this a wicket-stuff > project. We can always decide to move projects around later on. > > Eelco > > -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/thoof-open-source-contribution-tf4858158.html#a13904947 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
