Because IMO and many others that have used it, Git is > Jira, patches and svn and much prefer it. But if you want to work with patches, then that's fine. I will submit a patch later, as I was going to do anyway.
2008/10/10 Thijs Vonk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > James Carman wrote: > >> On Fri, Oct 10, 2008 at 11:35 AM, Jonathan Locke >> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >>> -1 >>> >>> i'm sick of new version control systems. i want simple eclipse >>> integration >>> and since SVN finally works for me i wish people would stick with it. >>> >>> >> >> Agreed! The git vs. svn discussion had been done before in different >> ASF forums and the bottom line is that the ASF uses SVN (currently) >> for its version control. Also, since source work is not supposed to >> be done "behind closed doors" (ASF is all about community) it's best >> if the work is done using the SVN repository. >> >> > Also I don't understand why we can't use Jira & patches as long as we're > not certain of the implementation. > I've seen large updates to codebases done this way @ lucene/solr and that > seems to work fine. > -- ___________________________ http://stubbisms.wordpress.com/
