Within the last 10 years SUN, so successfully, ironed into my brain that properties are ISO 8859-1, I wouldn't even dare to thinkt it could be different.
see also: http://java.sun.com/j2se/1.5.0/docs/api/java/util/Properties.html mf 2009/9/28 Juergen Donnerstag <[email protected]> > I think SUNs default is the char encoding configured with the OS or > env vars. If you don't explicitly provide a char encoding, that is > what is used. I don't think we should assume ISO 8859-1 or any other > to be the default, but use what is configured with the OS/env. > > -Juergen > > On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 1:49 PM, Robin Sander <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > > I think the default should remain ISO 8859-1 because otherwise 1.4.2 > > wouldn't be > > backward compatible. > > And isn't the Java default for property files ISO 8859-1so any deveoper > and > > most IDEs > > would assume this encoding? > > > > robin. > > > > > > On Sep 28, 2009, at 11:42, Johan Compagner wrote: > > > >> -1 then yes > >> that shouldnt be hardcoded but a property in our settings. > >> > >> > >> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 11:02, Ernesto Reinaldo Barreiro > >> <[email protected] > >>> > >>> wrote: > >> > >>>> [ X] No, don't release it and here is why... > >>>> > >>> > >>> After upgrading to 1.4.2 all my ISO-8859-1 encoded property files fail > to > >>> work. I haven't look into it in detail but I guess this is related to > >>> * [WICKET-2451] - Add ability to load UTF-8 encoded properties not > >>> in XML format. > >>> > >>> > >>> I know I shouldn't be using ISO-8859-1... but right now I have a bunch > of > >>> those properties files. Is there an easy way to get around this?.... > >>> After > >>> looking into changes I see the line (379).... > >>> > >>> Reader reader = new InputStreamReader(is, "UTF-8"); > >>> > >>> Shouldn't this be cofingurable somehow? > >>> > >>> Best, > >>> > >>> Ernesto > >>> > >>> > >>> On Mon, Sep 28, 2009 at 2:33 AM, Igor Vaynberg < > [email protected] > >>>> > >>>> wrote: > >>> > >>>> all votes are more then welcome. > >>>> > >>>> -igor > >>>> > >>>> On Sun, Sep 27, 2009 at 5:20 PM, Sam Stainsby > >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>>> > >>>>> Are non-binding votes preferred or discouraged here? If the former, > >>> > >>> then > >>>>> > >>>>> after some testing with my projects: > >>>>> > >>>>> (nonbinding) > >>>>> [X] Yes release > >>>>> [ ] No, don't release it and here is why... > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>> > > > > >
