-1 as well. Since the vote seems to be nothing more than "I like it" or "I don't like it".... I like it. I use it in my projects as well.
-- Jeremy Thomerson http://www.wickettraining.com On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 10:02 PM, Eelco Hillenius <[email protected]>wrote: > -1 > > Breaks compatibility for nothing other than a superficial > 'improvement'. Also, I do see the I used in other projects, and > actually like the convention (a whole lot better than using > AbstractFoo and Fooimpl fwiw). > > Eelco > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]> > wrote: > > is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket > > has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows this > > convention, is it time for a change? > > > > this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh > > aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch. > > > > -igor > > >
