I think that IFoo and Foo is every bit as bad as Foo and FooImpl. Both show rather poor choice of naming. Same goes for IModel and Model.
-Matej On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Eelco Hillenius <eelco.hillen...@gmail.com> wrote: > -1 > > Breaks compatibility for nothing other than a superficial > 'improvement'. Also, I do see the I used in other projects, and > actually like the convention (a whole lot better than using > AbstractFoo and Fooimpl fwiw). > > Eelco > > On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Igor Vaynberg <igor.vaynb...@gmail.com> wrote: >> is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket >> has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows this >> convention, is it time for a change? >> >> this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh >> aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch. >> >> -igor >> >
