Oh, +42 on removing I, and +42 on removing *Impl
On Oct 2, 2009, at 9:17 PM, Matej Knopp wrote:
I think that IFoo and Foo is every bit as bad as Foo and FooImpl. Both
show rather poor choice of naming. Same goes for IModel and Model.
-Matej
On Sat, Oct 3, 2009 at 5:02 AM, Eelco Hillenius
<[email protected]> wrote:
-1
Breaks compatibility for nothing other than a superficial
'improvement'. Also, I do see the I used in other projects, and
actually like the convention (a whole lot better than using
AbstractFoo and Fooimpl fwiw).
Eelco
On Fri, Oct 2, 2009 at 3:28 PM, Igor Vaynberg <[email protected]
> wrote:
is it perhaps time to take the I out of our interface names? wicket
has been the only project i have ever worked on/used that follows
this
convention, is it time for a change?
this is not meant as a flamewar about which convention is teh
aw3s0m3st, simply a discussion of whether or not we should switch.
-igor
Johan Edstrom
[email protected]
They that can give up essential liberty to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety.
Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759
