Andrea, Does this mean that there will be two versions of the guide ? One at Apache that uses the attachment in WICKET-5321<https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5321> and another maintained by ComSysto ? If YES then which one you will work on ? :-) I understand why Martijn wants the guide to be in ASF but my concerns are that: - there will be two versions of the guide and this will confuse the users, - and the ASF one will be behind the "commercially supported one" On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 10:40 PM, Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>wrote:Hi, there's no problem from a legal point of view. My company started to convert the guide to HTML the same days Martijn asked me to join Wicket team and we (at comSysto) are planning to enrich it with some use-cases from our customers. That said, as long as you use my original guide, you don't have to be afraid of anything as it was published under Creative Commons by-nc-sa (http://creativecommons.org/**licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/<http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/2.0/>) and you are free to modify and redistribute it. In addition, there's an explicit agreement between me and ASF that grants to this last one any right on this document for future usages/developments. Hope to have been clear. Andrea. On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 7:55 AM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]wrote:-0The guide is already published in HTML format [1] by ComSysto - Andrea's new employer. [...] whether everything is still legal. I'll let Andrea comment on the ComSysto part.As far as legal is concerned: if Andrea still intends to grant us the guide, it is legal and within the ASF guidelines. AFAIK the document was written by Andrea in his time and by him, and it is his right to distribute and license as he sees fit. Martijn
I understand your concerns. The original plan was to bring it to GitHub
to easily collect contributions also from other users, hence its
repository should became public. However, this project is quite recent
and is a work in progress and I must ask my colleagues and my boss for
more details about it.
That said, I still believe that the natural evolution of the guide is to
be part of the project to become that free documentation that was
missing. In addition, I hope that under the Apache umbrella, it will be
easier to maintain it and find other contributors.
- [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free Guide as a part of Apache W... Martijn Dashorst
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free Guide as a part of... Martijn Dashorst
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free Guide as a par... Jeremy Thomerson
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free Guide as a part of... cmenzel
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free Guide as a par... Emond Papegaaij
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free Guide as a part of... Michael Mosmann
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free Guide as a par... Martin Grigorov
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free Guide as a... Martijn Dashorst
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free Guide ... Andrea Del Bene
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free G... Martin Grigorov
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Fr... Andrea Del Bene
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicke... Carl-Eric Menzel
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free Guide as a part of... Igor Vaynberg
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free Guide as a part of... Andrea Del Bene
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free Guide as a par... Martin Grigorov
- Re: [VOTE] Accept the Wicket Free Guide as a part of... Sven Meier
