Hi, I have talked with the other guys in my company (comSysto) and this in short what come out:
-comSysto has no problem to donate what is already done, i.e. the repository at https://github.com/comsysto/wicket-userguide (currently is private). In this case any reference to comSysto and any copyright note would be removed, the repo would became (of course) public and I would be the owner (not comSysto). That said, Apache we will be free (of course) of cloning it, forking it or moving it to the Apache server. In meantime we can change the URL of the guide and make it an apache-domain URL, like for example 'wicket.apache.org/guide' or 'wicketguide.apache.org'. -we would like to keep the current format for documentation (Grails doc gdoc) which is quite easy to work with and is already ready to go online. -the company would like to keep a basic kind of reference to its corporate site. Is this possible? Can we do, for example, a list of contributors? Any suggestion/idea about this point? Thank you for your contributions. PS: I guess that the new format of the guide, no matter what, will be mirrored on GitHub just like the code repository, right? > Andrea del Bene has granted us the ability to include the Wicket Free Guide > into our project and to conclude the IP-clearance we need to actually vote > to have the guide accepted. The donated file is available as an attachment > at [1]. The grant actually lists the google code repository for reference, > so perhaps that one is more up to date. > > So here's the vote (runs for 72 hours): > > [ ] Yes, accept the Wicket Free Guide to incorporate into our project > [ ] No, don't accept the Wicket Free Guide > > Martijn > > PS. It is the intention to build a HTML version of the document using some > easy to maintain format, but the specifics of the conversion is not part of > this vote. > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5321 >
