Hi Andrea, Thanks for resolving this!
I think the next step is to put the files in https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/wicket/common/site/trunk, next to the rest of the site This will make it easy to upload any improvements. I don't like that we have to use SVN but this is how Apache PubSub works ... I think it should not be a problem if the guide lists all contributors and links to ComSysto, but I'll let Martijn to answer because he knows better Apache's rules. On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 6:22 PM, Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>wrote: > Hi, > > I have talked with the other guys in my company (comSysto) and this in > short what come out: > > -comSysto has no problem to donate what is already done, i.e. the > repository at https://github.com/comsysto/wicket-userguide (currently is > private). In this case any reference to comSysto and any copyright note > would be removed, the repo would became (of course) public and I would > be the owner (not comSysto). That said, Apache we will be free (of > course) of cloning it, forking it or moving it to the Apache server. In > meantime we can change the URL of the guide and make it an apache-domain > URL, like for example 'wicket.apache.org/guide' or 'wicketguide.apache.org > '. > -we would like to keep the current format for documentation (Grails doc > gdoc) which is quite easy to work with and is already ready to go online. > -the company would like to keep a basic kind of reference to its > corporate site. Is this possible? Can we do, for example, a list of > contributors? Any suggestion/idea about this point? > > Thank you for your contributions. > > PS: I guess that the new format of the guide, no matter what, will be > mirrored on GitHub just like the code repository, right? > > Andrea del Bene has granted us the ability to include the Wicket Free > Guide > > into our project and to conclude the IP-clearance we need to actually > vote > > to have the guide accepted. The donated file is available as an > attachment > > at [1]. The grant actually lists the google code repository for > reference, > > so perhaps that one is more up to date. > > > > So here's the vote (runs for 72 hours): > > > > [ ] Yes, accept the Wicket Free Guide to incorporate into our project > > [ ] No, don't accept the Wicket Free Guide > > > > Martijn > > > > PS. It is the intention to build a HTML version of the document using > some > > easy to maintain format, but the specifics of the conversion is not part > of > > this vote. > > > > [1]: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-5321 > > > >
