Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a release
so it might take some time :)
On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
insurmountable.
Martijn
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Tobias,
According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that already
uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
announcement).
I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have few
weeks to test before making a release.
I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and few
days later Martijn cuts the release.
@Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release scripts?
Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it possible to
run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
release.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
[email protected]> wrote:
Hi
should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be my
question.
kind regards
Tobias
Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>:
I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure yet.
Andrea.
On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
Good to know :)
So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hi,
My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
"production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
branches.
I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we have
time
to find any issues.
I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make a
release.
We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
My 2c.
Martin Grigorov
Wicket Training and Consulting
https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello Sven,
Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
It was sort of scheduled [1]
I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
WDYT?
[1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
[2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
[3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> wrote:
Hi Maxim,
your on the right list :P
There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
Have fun
Sven
On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no estimates? :)
WBR, Maxim
(from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <[email protected]>
wrote:
Hello All,
Do you have any estimates for the subject?
Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
--
WBR
Maxim aka solomax
