Thanks a lot Andrea! WBR, Maxim (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]> wrote: everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i will try later this evening . On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]> wrote: > I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one :-) > > > On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: > >> Hello, >> >> Any news on topic? >> >> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >> One short note: >>> >>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only 1,2,3 - >>> 3 >>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3 >>> >>> kind regards >>> >>> Tobias >>> >>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>: >>>> >>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a release >>>> >>> so it might take some time :) >>> >>>> >>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote: >>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things >>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not >>>>> insurmountable. >>>>> >>>>> Martijn >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected] >>>>>> > >>>>>> >>>>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Tobias, >>>>>> >>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that >>>>>> >>>>> already >>> >>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the >>>>>> announcement). >>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have >>>>>> few >>>>>> weeks to test before making a release. >>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and >>>>>> >>>>> few >>> >>>> days later Martijn cuts the release. >>>>>> >>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release scripts? >>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it >>>>>> >>>>> possible to >>> >>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a >>>>>> release. >>>>>> >>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Hi >>>>>>> >>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be >>>>>>> my >>>>>>> question. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> kind regards >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Tobias >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected] >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> : >>>> >>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> yet. >>> >>>> Andrea. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Good to know :) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :)) >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov < >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>> >>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the >>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> branches. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> have >>> >>>> time >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> to find any issues. >>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make a >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> My 2c. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven, >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :))) >>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1] >>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now >>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :))) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great >>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :) >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr >>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287 >>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi Maxim, >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun >>>>>>>>>>>> Sven >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :) >>> >>>> WBR, Maxim >>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos) >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" < >>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Hello All, >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :))) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> >> >
