Hi Andrea, did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3?
kind regards Tobias > Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>: > > ok, I've manually closed it. > > >> On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote: >> @Martijn >> >> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create it but >> it's not exposed >> (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080). >> Any clue? >> >> >>> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>> Thanks a lot Andrea! >>> >>> WBR, Maxim >>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos) >>> >>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i will try >>> later this evening . >>> >>>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one :-) >>>> >>>> >>>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>> >>>>> Hello, >>>>> >>>>> Any news on topic? >>>>> >>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < >>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> One short note: >>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only 1,2,3 - >>>>>> 3 >>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3 >>>>>> >>>>>> kind regards >>>>>> >>>>>> Tobias >>>>>> >>>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>: >>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a >>> release >>>>>> so it might take some time :) >>>>>> >>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote: >>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things >>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not >>>>>>>> insurmountable. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Martijn >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov <[email protected] >>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Tobias, >>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> already >>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the >>>>>>>>> announcement). >>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have >>>>>>>>> few >>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release. >>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today and >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> few >>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release. >>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release >>> scripts? >>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> possible to >>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a >>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Hi >>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be >>>>>>>>>> my >>>>>>>>>> question. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> kind regards >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Tobias >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected] >>>>>>>>>> : >>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure >>>>>>>>>> yet. >>>>>>> Andrea. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017. >>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :) >>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :)) >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov < >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the >>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> branches. >>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we >>>>>>>>>>>> have >>>>>>> time >>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues. >>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make >>> a >>>>>>>>>>>> release. >>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017. >>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c. >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov >>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting >>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik < >>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven, >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :))) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1] >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now >>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :))) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :) >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT? >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056 >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <[email protected]> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>> Hi Maxim, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :) >>>>>>> WBR, Maxim >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" < >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All, >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject? >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :))) >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- >>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>> >> >
