Hi Andrea,

no I just saw that in master the version was 4-SNAPSHOT. There are no 
requirements to release new versions each time. 1 was for 6.x, 2 was for 7.x 
and 3 was for master (8.x) branch. If version 4 is in the release now this is 
nothing bad, but it is not required to be released each time with wicket.

Can you have a look at the released master version? If there is a 4 we also 
need to release wicket-eclipse-settings 4 - otherwise there will be issues for 
all who downloaded the eclipse-settings module from the marketplace - there 
will be an eclipse error saying that version 4 is not available.

kind regards

Tobias

> Am 27.12.2016 um 09:56 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>:
> 
> I'm afraid I wasn't aware of this module. Is there something specific to do 
> for the release?
> 
> 
>> On 27/12/2016 09:33, Tobias Soloschenko wrote:
>> Hi Andrea,
>> 
>> did you took version 3 of wicket-eclipse-settings for release 8-M3?
>> 
>> kind regards
>> 
>> Tobias
>> 
>>> Am 26.12.2016 um 20:51 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>:
>>> 
>>> ok, I've manually closed it.
>>> 
>>> 
>>>> On 26/12/2016 20:02, Andrea Del Bene wrote:
>>>> @Martijn
>>>> 
>>>> I have a problem with staging repository. Apparently I can create it but 
>>>> it's not exposed 
>>>> (https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachewicket-1080). 
>>>> Any clue?
>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>>> On 26/12/2016 17:09, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>> Thanks a lot Andrea!
>>>>> 
>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>> 
>>>>> On Dec 26, 2016 23:08, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>> 
>>>>> everything went fine....except for the staging repository :-(. i will try
>>>>> later this evening .
>>>>> 
>>>>>> On 26 Dec 2016 15:21, "Andrea Del Bene" <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> I've started the release right now. Give me a minute...a long one :-)
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On 26/12/2016 05:58, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Any news on topic?
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> On Fri, Dec 23, 2016 at 5:48 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> One short note:
>>>>>>>> eclipse-settings version have been increased, but there are only 1,2,3 
>>>>>>>> -
>>>>>>>> 3
>>>>>>>> is for wicket 8 - so if the build fails go for version 3
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Am 23.12.2016 um 10:15 schrieb Andrea Del Bene <[email protected]>:
>>>>>>>>> Yes, I can confirm that. But it's the first time I try to make a
>>>>> release
>>>>>>>> so it might take some time :)
>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 23:07, Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> AFAIK the release script can be run by Andrea. There were some things
>>>>>>>>>> with passwords for services used (repository.a.o) but those are not
>>>>>>>>>> insurmountable.
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> Martijn
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:24 PM, Martin Grigorov 
>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Tobias,
>>>>>>>>>>> According to the mail from Jim (legals director) any project that
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> already
>>>>>>>>> uses json.org should get rid of it until April 2017 (6 months from the
>>>>>>>>>>> announcement).
>>>>>>>>>>> I don't mind merging the OpenJson branches now, but only if we have
>>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>>>> weeks to test before making a release.
>>>>>>>>>>> I just want to avoid something like: you merge the branches today 
>>>>>>>>>>> and
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> few
>>>>>>>>> days later Martijn cuts the release.
>>>>>>>>>>> @Martijn and Andrea: what is the current state of the release
>>>>> scripts?
>>>>>>>>>>> Martijn said that you will work on them at ApacheCon to make it
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>> possible to
>>>>>>>>> run on Ubuntu too. It would be good if more than one person can make a
>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 8:07 PM, Tobias Soloschenko <
>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>> Hi
>>>>>>>>>>>> should the release already exclude json.org or not - that would be
>>>>>>>>>>>> my
>>>>>>>>>>>> question.
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> kind regards
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Tobias
>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>> Am 22.12.2016 um 17:08 schrieb Andrea Del Bene 
>>>>>>>>>>>> <[email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>> :
>>>>>>>>>> I might find some time before the new year but I am not 100% sure
>>>>>>>>>>>> yet.
>>>>>>>>> Andrea.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 22/12/2016 08:16, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Good to know :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> So as I can see no blockers for 7.6.0 release :))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 2:04 PM, Martin Grigorov <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My personal opinion: the OpenJson change should be merged to the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> "production" branches only if we have some time to test in those
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> branches.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> I prefer to merge them right after the release of 6.26/7.6 so we
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> time
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to find any issues.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I don't want this change to be merged and two days later to make
>>>>> a
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> release.
>>>>>>>>>>>>> We could use org.json without legal issues until April 2017.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> My 2c.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Martin Grigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Wicket Training and Consulting
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> https://twitter.com/mtgrigorov
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Dec 22, 2016 at 4:28 AM, Maxim Solodovnik <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello Sven,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe It's time to schedule the release? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> It was sort of scheduled [1]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I guess WICKET-6287 [2] is resolved now
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> And I really would like to have WICKET-6056 [3] changes :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> I believe both Wicket* and OpenMeetings releases would be great
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Christmas/NY presents for our users :)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [1] http://markmail.org/message/tzl2pdmywjsqd3vr
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [2] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6287
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [3] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-6056
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Wed, Dec 21, 2016 at 9:58 PM, Sven Meier <[email protected]>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> Hi Maxim,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> your on the right list :P
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> There's just no ETA for the next release yet.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Have fun
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Sven
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On 21.12.2016 15:55, Maxim Solodovnik wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Am I asking wrong mailing list? Or maybe there are no
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> estimates? :)
>>>>>>>>> WBR, Maxim
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> (from mobile, sorry for the typos)
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Dec 19, 2016 21:13, "Maxim Solodovnik" <
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> [email protected]
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Do you have any estimates for the subject?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maybe this can be released before NY? :)))
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> -- 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> WBR
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Maxim aka solomax
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> 
> 

Reply via email to