I've checked uBlock with Firefox and AdBlocker with Chrome, both with default configs, and I see no problem. Obviously IE/Edge always behaves in its own, peculiar way :-).
On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:12 AM Martijn Dashorst < martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, we did everything well: the fonts are hosted at Apache, not > loaded from external site that tracks their usage (looking at you > fonts.google.com), the SVG even embeds the font file in a data uri. If > the adblocker then still blocks the font, what can we do? Introduce a > 4MB PNG file? Or should the adblocker at least honor same domain > requests for resources and not block data URI's? > > The font face used for the logo is narrow and there are no web-safe > fonts that render correctly in this instance: I've tried with Arial > Narrow and sans-serif as a fallback: the logo still looks badly > broken. > > AFAIK we can't detect whether someone uses an adblocker that > specifically blocks web fonts, serve them the 8GB binary images, and > serve the rest of the world the 80kb SVG file. > > I understand the need for an adblocker, but when you use one (wrongly) > you are responsible for when shit breaks. > > Martijn > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:46 AM Vit Rozkovec <vit.rozko...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > > HI, > > > > please see this screenshot: > > https://screenshots.firefox.com/v4PQv7WIKAv1TiUA/null > > > > This is how is the site visible when you browse it with adblock that > > blocks also some fonts. > > > > Discovered when one my colleague who is learning Wicket and uses Windows > > wanted to show it to someone else, not a very good first impression :) > > > > I think it would be good to have a default that displays ok even when > > fonts are blocked, what do you think? > > > > Have a nice day > > Vit > > > > > -- > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com > -- Andrea Del Bene. Apache Wicket committer.
