So no extra configuration whatsoever.
úterý 22. ledna 2019 Vit Rozkovec <vit.rozko...@gmail.com> napsal(a): > He had uBlock Original 1.15, configuration status unknown. > > Wouldn't simple svg fix that? > > > úterý 22. ledna 2019 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> napsal(a): >> @Vit, maybe you can share which AdBlocker have you used and how it was >> configured? >> >> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 18:56, Martijn Dashorst < martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> My guess is that if a web font from same origin is blocked, JavaScript >>> will fail as well. >>> >>> Martijn >>> >>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:25 PM Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > Maybe something like this >>> > >>> > >>> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1271477/changing-body-font-size-based-on-font-family-with-jquery >>> > >>> > can be used? >>> > >>> > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 17:27, Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> > >>> > > I've checked uBlock with Firefox and AdBlocker with Chrome, both with >>> > > default configs, and I see no problem. Obviously IE/Edge always >>> behaves in >>> > > its own, peculiar way :-). >>> > > >>> > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:12 AM Martijn Dashorst < >>> > > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> > > >>> > > > Well, we did everything well: the fonts are hosted at Apache, not >>> > > > loaded from external site that tracks their usage (looking at you >>> > > > fonts.google.com), the SVG even embeds the font file in a data uri. >>> If >>> > > > the adblocker then still blocks the font, what can we do? Introduce a >>> > > > 4MB PNG file? Or should the adblocker at least honor same domain >>> > > > requests for resources and not block data URI's? >>> > > > >>> > > > The font face used for the logo is narrow and there are no web-safe >>> > > > fonts that render correctly in this instance: I've tried with Arial >>> > > > Narrow and sans-serif as a fallback: the logo still looks badly >>> > > > broken. >>> > > > >>> > > > AFAIK we can't detect whether someone uses an adblocker that >>> > > > specifically blocks web fonts, serve them the 8GB binary images, and >>> > > > serve the rest of the world the 80kb SVG file. >>> > > > >>> > > > I understand the need for an adblocker, but when you use one >>> (wrongly) >>> > > > you are responsible for when shit breaks. >>> > > > >>> > > > Martijn >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:46 AM Vit Rozkovec < vit.rozko...@gmail.com >>> > >>> > > > wrote: >>> > > > > >>> > > > > HI, >>> > > > > >>> > > > > please see this screenshot: >>> > > > > https://screenshots.firefox.com/v4PQv7WIKAv1TiUA/null >>> > > > > >>> > > > > This is how is the site visible when you browse it with adblock >>> that >>> > > > > blocks also some fonts. >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Discovered when one my colleague who is learning Wicket and uses >>> > > Windows >>> > > > > wanted to show it to someone else, not a very good first >>> impression :) >>> > > > > >>> > > > > I think it would be good to have a default that displays ok even >>> when >>> > > > > fonts are blocked, what do you think? >>> > > > > >>> > > > > Have a nice day >>> > > > > Vit >>> > > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > >>> > > > -- >>> > > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: >>> http://wicketinaction.com >>> > > > >>> > > >>> > > >>> > > -- >>> > > Andrea Del Bene. >>> > > Apache Wicket committer. >>> > > >>> > >>> > >>> > -- >>> > WBR >>> > Maxim aka solomax >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >>> >> >> >> -- >> WBR >> Maxim aka solomax >>
