I agree with Korbinian! Windows users are saints! They decided themselves to spend their live in suffering! (don't confuse with surfing!) :-)
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 9:29 AM Korbinian Bachl < korbinian.ba...@whiskyworld.de> wrote: > Option 3: > 1) wait for MS to apply the switch to the chromium engine (ditching the > current edge engine completely - see: > https://www.computerworld.com/article/3325333/web-browsers/with-move-to-rebuild-edge-atop-googles-chromium-microsoft-raises-white-flag-in-browser-war.html > ) > 2) relax while doing 1) > > IMHO: this is an edge case affecting nearly nobody - since nearly nobody > uses edge anyway. It was the worst browser from beginning since MS never > put any real work in it and if anyone has a problem he can switch to FF or > Chrome or maybe even the 1 user in 10 000 disable his plugins for the > wicket page? Better put the time needed into work for wicket; In the end, > next week a user of lynx will come and complain the the wicket page isnt as > good as expected.... > > my 2c; > > > PS: I dont know any (!) developer using solely 1 browser anyway - > especially since the developer tools in either IE or edge are such > useless... Everytime I needed to fix a major IE or EDGE issue in the past > it was horrible compared to such a task in FF or Chrome > > ----- Ursprüngliche Mail ----- > > Von: "Maxim Solodovnik" gmail.com> > > An: dev@wicket.apache.org > > Gesendet: Freitag, 25. Januar 2019 04:12:33 > > Betreff: Re: Wicket site with adblocker @ MS Edge > > > Hello @Devs, > > > > I was able to reproduce the issue, and I believe it can be fixed if we > will > > Option 0: > > 1) provide PNG instead of SVG > > > > Option 1: > > 1) check if embedded web font exist using JS > > 2) if not will insert PNG image of SVG currently being used > > > > Option 2: > > 1) modify SVG to have circle and crown only > > 2) move text and web-font outside SVN to be regular DIV elements > > > > WDYT? > > > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 21:29, Vit Rozkovec <vit.rozko...@gmail.com> > wrote: > > > >> So no extra configuration whatsoever. > >> > >> úterý 22. ledna 2019 Vit Rozkovec <vit.rozko...@gmail.com> napsal(a): > >> > He had uBlock Original 1.15, configuration status unknown. > >> > > >> > Wouldn't simple svg fix that? > >> > > >> > > >> > úterý 22. ledna 2019 Maxim Solodovnik gmail.com> napsal(a): > >> >> @Vit, maybe you can share which AdBlocker have you used and how it > was > >> >> configured? > >> >> > >> >> On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 18:56, Martijn Dashorst < > >> martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> > >> >> wrote: > >> >> > >> >>> My guess is that if a web font from same origin is blocked, > JavaScript > >> >>> will fail as well. > >> >>> > >> >>> Martijn > >> >>> > >> >>> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:25 PM Maxim Solodovnik < > >> solomax...@gmail.com> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> > Maybe something like this > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > >> > >> > https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1271477/changing-body-font-size-based-on-font-family-with-jquery > >> >>> > > >> >>> > can be used? > >> >>> > > >> >>> > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 17:27, Andrea Del Bene delb...@gmail.com> > >> >>> wrote: > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > I've checked uBlock with Firefox and AdBlocker with Chrome, both > >> with > >> >>> > > default configs, and I see no problem. Obviously IE/Edge always > >> >>> behaves in > >> >>> > > its own, peculiar way :-). > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:12 AM Martijn Dashorst < > >> >>> > > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > Well, we did everything well: the fonts are hosted at Apache, > not > >> >>> > > > loaded from external site that tracks their usage (looking at > you > >> >>> > > > fonts.google.com), the SVG even embeds the font file in a > data > >> uri. > >> >>> If > >> >>> > > > the adblocker then still blocks the font, what can we do? > >> Introduce a > >> >>> > > > 4MB PNG file? Or should the adblocker at least honor same > domain > >> >>> > > > requests for resources and not block data URI's? > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > The font face used for the logo is narrow and there are no > >> web-safe > >> >>> > > > fonts that render correctly in this instance: I've tried with > >> Arial > >> >>> > > > Narrow and sans-serif as a fallback: the logo still looks > badly > >> >>> > > > broken. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > AFAIK we can't detect whether someone uses an adblocker that > >> >>> > > > specifically blocks web fonts, serve them the 8GB binary > images, > >> and > >> >>> > > > serve the rest of the world the 80kb SVG file. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > I understand the need for an adblocker, but when you use one > >> >>> (wrongly) > >> >>> > > > you are responsible for when shit breaks. > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > Martijn > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:46 AM Vit Rozkovec < > >> vit.rozko...@gmail.com > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > > wrote: > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > HI, > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > please see this screenshot: > >> >>> > > > > https://screenshots.firefox.com/v4PQv7WIKAv1TiUA/null > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > This is how is the site visible when you browse it with > adblock > >> >>> that > >> >>> > > > > blocks also some fonts. > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > Discovered when one my colleague who is learning Wicket and > >> uses > >> >>> > > Windows > >> >>> > > > > wanted to show it to someone else, not a very good first > >> >>> impression :) > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > I think it would be good to have a default that displays ok > >> even > >> >>> when > >> >>> > > > > fonts are blocked, what do you think? > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > Have a nice day > >> >>> > > > > Vit > >> >>> > > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > -- > >> >>> > > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: > >> >>> http://wicketinaction.com > >> >>> > > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > -- > >> >>> > > Andrea Del Bene. > >> >>> > > Apache Wicket committer. > >> >>> > > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > > >> >>> > -- > >> >>> > WBR > >> >>> > Maxim aka solomax > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> > >> >>> -- > >> >>> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: > http://wicketinaction.com > >> >>> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> -- > >> >> WBR > >> >> Maxim aka solomax > >> >> > >> > > > > > > -- > > WBR > > Maxim aka solomax >
