He had uBlock Original 1.15, configuration status unknown. Wouldn't simple svg fix that?
úterý 22. ledna 2019 Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> napsal(a): > @Vit, maybe you can share which AdBlocker have you used and how it was > configured? > > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 18:56, Martijn Dashorst <martijn.dasho...@gmail.com > > wrote: > >> My guess is that if a web font from same origin is blocked, JavaScript >> will fail as well. >> >> Martijn >> >> On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 12:25 PM Maxim Solodovnik <solomax...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > Maybe something like this >> > >> > >> https://stackoverflow.com/questions/1271477/changing-body-font-size-based-on-font-family-with-jquery >> > >> > can be used? >> > >> > On Tue, 22 Jan 2019 at 17:27, Andrea Del Bene <an.delb...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> > >> > > I've checked uBlock with Firefox and AdBlocker with Chrome, both with >> > > default configs, and I see no problem. Obviously IE/Edge always >> behaves in >> > > its own, peculiar way :-). >> > > >> > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 11:12 AM Martijn Dashorst < >> > > martijn.dasho...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > > >> > > > Well, we did everything well: the fonts are hosted at Apache, not >> > > > loaded from external site that tracks their usage (looking at you >> > > > fonts.google.com), the SVG even embeds the font file in a data uri. >> If >> > > > the adblocker then still blocks the font, what can we do? Introduce a >> > > > 4MB PNG file? Or should the adblocker at least honor same domain >> > > > requests for resources and not block data URI's? >> > > > >> > > > The font face used for the logo is narrow and there are no web-safe >> > > > fonts that render correctly in this instance: I've tried with Arial >> > > > Narrow and sans-serif as a fallback: the logo still looks badly >> > > > broken. >> > > > >> > > > AFAIK we can't detect whether someone uses an adblocker that >> > > > specifically blocks web fonts, serve them the 8GB binary images, and >> > > > serve the rest of the world the 80kb SVG file. >> > > > >> > > > I understand the need for an adblocker, but when you use one >> (wrongly) >> > > > you are responsible for when shit breaks. >> > > > >> > > > Martijn >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > On Tue, Jan 22, 2019 at 9:46 AM Vit Rozkovec < vit.rozko...@gmail.com >> > >> > > > wrote: >> > > > > >> > > > > HI, >> > > > > >> > > > > please see this screenshot: >> > > > > https://screenshots.firefox.com/v4PQv7WIKAv1TiUA/null >> > > > > >> > > > > This is how is the site visible when you browse it with adblock >> that >> > > > > blocks also some fonts. >> > > > > >> > > > > Discovered when one my colleague who is learning Wicket and uses >> > > Windows >> > > > > wanted to show it to someone else, not a very good first >> impression :) >> > > > > >> > > > > I think it would be good to have a default that displays ok even >> when >> > > > > fonts are blocked, what do you think? >> > > > > >> > > > > Have a nice day >> > > > > Vit >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > >> > > > -- >> > > > Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: >> http://wicketinaction.com >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -- >> > > Andrea Del Bene. >> > > Apache Wicket committer. >> > > >> > >> > >> > -- >> > WBR >> > Maxim aka solomax >> >> >> >> -- >> Become a Wicket expert, learn from the best: http://wicketinaction.com >> > > > -- > WBR > Maxim aka solomax >
