On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 6:08 PM, Ishara Karunarathna <[email protected]> wrote:
> HI Pulasthi, > > Initially, industry adoption to SCIM 2.0 was less compare to SCIM 1.1, But > seems to be its getting to the track[1] > so +1 let's make SCIM 2.0 as default. > +1 for this. > > -Ishara > > [1] http://www.simplecloud.info/ > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Pulasthi Mahawithana <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> Shall we make $subject instead of SCIM 1.1? Any known issues on having it >> as default? Users who are migrating from older versions will still have >> SCIM 1.1 configs and won't be affected as they would keep the old configs. >> >> >> -- >> *Pulasthi Mahawithana* >> Senior Software Engineer >> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com/ >> Mobile: +94-71-5179022 <+94%2071%20517%209022> >> Blog: https://medium.com/@pulasthi7/ >> >> <https://wso2.com/signature> >> > > > > -- > Ishara Karunarathna > Associate Technical Lead > WSO2 Inc. - lean . enterprise . middleware | wso2.com > > email: [email protected], blog: isharaaruna.blogspot.com, mobile: > +94717996791 <+94%2071%20799%206791> > > >
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
