Hi Gayan, Due to the limitation we have in the user core level, we don't support complex filtering, pagination, sorting. Refer [1] & [2].
[1] https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provisioning-scim2/blob/v1.0.5/components/org.wso2.carbon.identity.scim2.common/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/identity/scim2/common/impl/SCIMUserManager.java#L834 [2] https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-provisioning-scim2/blob/v1.0.5/components/org.wso2.carbon.identity.scim2.common/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/identity/scim2/common/impl/SCIMUserManager.java#L793 Thanks, On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Gayan Gunawardana <ga...@wso2.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < > vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk> wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> +1 for this as the global adoption of SCIM 2.0 is right on the track as >> Ishara has mentioned. >> > @Vindula > Do we support pagination, complex filters and bulk operation to resolve > cyclic dependencies. As I know you have implemented these features but > there are some limitations because of C4 user core component. I am not sure > about the meaning of word "default" but if we are promoting SCIM 2.0, have > to inform what is the real value getting out of it. > >> >> Thanks >> >> *Vindula Jayawardana* >> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >> University of Moratuwa >> mobile : +713462554 >> Email : vindula...@cse.mrt.ac.lk >> >> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >> >> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to impress. "* >> >> >> *-Richard Branson-* >> >> >> >> On 11 September 2017 at 19:10, Darshana Gunawardana <darsh...@wso2.com> >> wrote: >> >>> One aspect is that we don't have a SCIM 2.0 outbound provisioning >>> connector available. So IS to IS provisioning will not be smooth until we >>> get the outbound provisioning connector ready. >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Pulasthi Mahawithana < >>> pulast...@wso2.com> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> Shall we make $subject instead of SCIM 1.1? Any known issues on having >>>> it as default? Users who are migrating from older versions will still have >>>> SCIM 1.1 configs and won't be affected as they would keep the old configs. >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> *Pulasthi Mahawithana* >>>> Senior Software Engineer >>>> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com/ >>>> Mobile: +94-71-5179022 <+94%2071%20517%209022> >>>> Blog: https://medium.com/@pulasthi7/ >>>> >>>> <https://wso2.com/signature> >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> *Darshana Gunawardana*Technical Lead >>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >>> >>> *E-mail: darsh...@wso2.com <darsh...@wso2.com>* >>> *Mobile: +94718566859 <+94%2071%20856%206859>*Lean . Enterprise . >>> Middleware >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Dev mailing list >>> Dev@wso2.org >>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev >>> >>> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Dev mailing list >> Dev@wso2.org >> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev >> >> > > > -- > Gayan Gunawardana > Senior Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/ > Email: ga...@wso2.com > Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933 > -- Regards, *Darshana Gunawardana*Technical Lead WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com *E-mail: darsh...@wso2.com <darsh...@wso2.com>* *Mobile: +94718566859*Lean . Enterprise . Middleware
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list Dev@wso2.org http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
