On Sun, Sep 17, 2017 at 9:42 PM, Gayan Gunawardana <[email protected]> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:29 AM, Darshana Gunawardana <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> Hi Prabath, >> >> We do have two endpoints for SCIM 1.1 & SCIM 2. But there are some >> listeners we need to enable in order to populated relevant metadata such as >> ID, Created\Modified dates against the correct URI specified by the each >> specification. >> >> Given that, different clients may use different protocol of they already >> support, we should have ability to have both protocols working >> simultaneously. >> > According to this even single client can use SCIM 1.1 and 2.0 > simultaneously right ? > Yes so ideally it should work but in practice it will bring some > complexities. We have to test use-cases like creating user with SCIM 1.1 > and updating with SCIM 2.0. > IMO we should support only one protocol at a time but not both. > Can we please identify those complexities...? We cannot terminate support for SCIM 1.1 - both have to co-exist for few releases till we deprecate SCIM 1.1. If both cannot co-exist then we need to review our design... Thanks & regards, -Prabath > >> Created: https://wso2.org/jira/browse/IDENTITY-6458 to track this. >> >> Thanks, >> >> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 8:11 AM, Darshana Gunawardana <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi Gayan, >>> >>> Due to the limitation we have in the user core level, we don't support >>> complex filtering, pagination, sorting. Refer [1] & [2]. >>> >>> [1] https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-prov >>> isioning-scim2/blob/v1.0.5/components/org.wso2.carbon.identi >>> ty.scim2.common/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/identity/scim2 >>> /common/impl/SCIMUserManager.java#L834 >>> [2] https://github.com/wso2-extensions/identity-inbound-prov >>> isioning-scim2/blob/v1.0.5/components/org.wso2.carbon.identi >>> ty.scim2.common/src/main/java/org/wso2/carbon/identity/scim2 >>> /common/impl/SCIMUserManager.java#L793 >>> >>> Thanks, >>> >>> On Mon, Sep 18, 2017 at 7:50 AM, Gayan Gunawardana <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> >>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 9:14 PM, Vindula Jayawardana < >>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> +1 for this as the global adoption of SCIM 2.0 is right on the track >>>>> as Ishara has mentioned. >>>>> >>>> @Vindula >>>> Do we support pagination, complex filters and bulk operation to resolve >>>> cyclic dependencies. As I know you have implemented these features but >>>> there are some limitations because of C4 user core component. I am not sure >>>> about the meaning of word "default" but if we are promoting SCIM 2.0, have >>>> to inform what is the real value getting out of it. >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Thanks >>>>> >>>>> *Vindula Jayawardana* >>>>> Computer Science and Engineering Dept. >>>>> University of Moratuwa >>>>> mobile : +713462554 >>>>> Email : [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> <https://www.facebook.com/vindula.jayawardana> >>>>> <http://lk.linkedin.com/pub/vindula-jayawardana/a7/315/53b> >>>>> <https://plus.google.com/u/0/+VindulaJayawardana/posts> >>>>> <https://twitter.com/vindulajay> >>>>> >>>>> *“Respect is how to treat everyone, not just those you want to >>>>> impress. "* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> *-Richard Branson-* >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 11 September 2017 at 19:10, Darshana Gunawardana <[email protected] >>>>> > wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> One aspect is that we don't have a SCIM 2.0 outbound provisioning >>>>>> connector available. So IS to IS provisioning will not be smooth until we >>>>>> get the outbound provisioning connector ready. >>>>>> >>>>>> On Mon, Sep 11, 2017 at 5:34 PM, Pulasthi Mahawithana < >>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Shall we make $subject instead of SCIM 1.1? Any known issues on >>>>>>> having it as default? Users who are migrating from older versions will >>>>>>> still have SCIM 1.1 configs and won't be affected as they would keep the >>>>>>> old configs. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> *Pulasthi Mahawithana* >>>>>>> Senior Software Engineer >>>>>>> WSO2 Inc., http://wso2.com/ >>>>>>> Mobile: +94-71-5179022 <+94%2071%20517%209022> >>>>>>> Blog: https://medium.com/@pulasthi7/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> <https://wso2.com/signature> >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> *Darshana Gunawardana*Technical Lead >>>>>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >>>>>> >>>>>> *E-mail: [email protected] <[email protected]>* >>>>>> *Mobile: +94718566859 <+94%2071%20856%206859>*Lean . Enterprise . >>>>>> Middleware >>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Dev mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Dev mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> -- >>>> Gayan Gunawardana >>>> Senior Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/ >>>> Email: [email protected] >>>> Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933 >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Regards, >>> >>> >>> *Darshana Gunawardana*Technical Lead >>> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >>> >>> *E-mail: [email protected] <[email protected]>* >>> *Mobile: +94718566859 <+94%2071%20856%206859>*Lean . Enterprise . >>> Middleware >>> >> >> >> >> -- >> Regards, >> >> >> *Darshana Gunawardana*Technical Lead >> WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com >> >> *E-mail: [email protected] <[email protected]>* >> *Mobile: +94718566859 <+94%2071%20856%206859>*Lean . Enterprise . >> Middleware >> > > > > -- > Gayan Gunawardana > Senior Software Engineer; WSO2 Inc.; http://wso2.com/ > Email: [email protected] > Mobile: +94 (71) 8020933 > -- Thanks & Regards, Prabath Twitter : @prabath LinkedIn : http://www.linkedin.com/in/prabathsiriwardena Mobile : +1 650 625 7950 http://facilelogin.com
_______________________________________________ Dev mailing list [email protected] http://wso2.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/dev
