I think we should do it before. That sends a clearer message to people who isn't heavily involved.
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Paul Merlin <[email protected]> wrote: > Hey, > > Niclas Hedhman a écrit : > > Gang, > > > > Since we have decided to run with Apache Zest (instead of Apache Qi4j), > > shouldn't we commit to that name full on. I.e. Qi4j is named "Apache > Zest" > > for common talk, and "Apache Zest Java Edition" if Qi4CS (then Apache > Zest > > C# Edition, or CLR Edition) joins us and where there is a difference > > between the two. > > > > If we think this is how we should move forward, I want to start modifying > > all the documentation to this effect. > > > > WDYAT? > This makes sense to me and I think it will make much more sense to any > newcomer. > > So, this is a +1 from me. > > We're almost good WRT releasing 2.1 under the org.qi4j groupId/package > (see ZEST-24). > Shall we rename/rebrand before or after 2.1? > > Cheers > > /Paul > > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
