I am Ok with that... On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:11 PM, Paul Merlin <[email protected]> wrote:
> Niclas Hedhman a écrit : > > I think we should do it before. That sends a clearer message to people > who > > isn't heavily involved. > > But, on second thought, that would bring up the issue about Java package > > names... > > So, could we rename everything BUT java packages for 2.1? > Then, what if we explain this in the release notes and in the > documentation? > > Something along the lines of: > > "Apache Zest Java Edition 2.1 is the first release of the Qi4j codebase > under the Apache Software Foundation umbrella. To keep backward > compatiblity, this version still use org.qi4j.* java packages. Please > note that this will change in 3.0." > > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
