But, on second thought, that would bring up the issue about Java package names...
On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 12:02 PM, Niclas Hedhman <[email protected]> wrote: > > I think we should do it before. That sends a clearer message to people who > isn't heavily involved. > > On Mon, Jul 6, 2015 at 11:56 AM, Paul Merlin <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Hey, >> >> Niclas Hedhman a écrit : >> > Gang, >> > >> > Since we have decided to run with Apache Zest (instead of Apache Qi4j), >> > shouldn't we commit to that name full on. I.e. Qi4j is named "Apache >> Zest" >> > for common talk, and "Apache Zest Java Edition" if Qi4CS (then Apache >> Zest >> > C# Edition, or CLR Edition) joins us and where there is a difference >> > between the two. >> > >> > If we think this is how we should move forward, I want to start >> modifying >> > all the documentation to this effect. >> > >> > WDYAT? >> This makes sense to me and I think it will make much more sense to any >> newcomer. >> >> So, this is a +1 from me. >> >> We're almost good WRT releasing 2.1 under the org.qi4j groupId/package >> (see ZEST-24). >> Shall we rename/rebrand before or after 2.1? >> >> Cheers >> >> /Paul >> >> > > > -- > Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer > http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java > -- Niclas Hedhman, Software Developer http://zest.apache.org - New Energy for Java
