Niclas Hedhman a écrit : > I think we should do it before. That sends a clearer message to people who > isn't heavily involved. > But, on second thought, that would bring up the issue about Java package > names...
So, could we rename everything BUT java packages for 2.1? Then, what if we explain this in the release notes and in the documentation? Something along the lines of: "Apache Zest Java Edition 2.1 is the first release of the Qi4j codebase under the Apache Software Foundation umbrella. To keep backward compatiblity, this version still use org.qi4j.* java packages. Please note that this will change in 3.0."
